Truth Zone: FBI Whistleblowers Expose Lying Crooked Hillary Corruption, Massive Cover Ups

Truth Zone:

truth2momentFBI Whistleblowers Expose Lying Crooked Hillary Corruption, Massive Cover Ups

Rush Limbaugh

hillarypowerFBI Document Dump Proves This Woman Has No Business Anywhere Near Power

Nurse Ratched

Hillary-and-Nurse-RatchedThis is astounding what the FBI dumped yesterday.  Why this hasn’t been dumped earlier is obvious.  It is damning!  It is destroying of Hillary Clinton, as a person, as a secretary of state.  I go through all these emails.  Have any of you who’ve spent any time going through any of the emails, part of the WikiLeaks dump, are you seeing anybody that works for her talk about what a nice person she is?  I am not.  I see references to friends of Bill that need this and friends of Bill that need that.  I don’t see any references to friends of Hillary.

But all the stories that we heard back when the Clintons were in the White House about Hillary disliking the Marines, disrespecting the Marines, throwing ashtrays, apparently it’s true, because she did it at the State Department.  She was so mean to people that State Department security agents, which they have, every bureaucracy has security agents that travel with the ambassadors, with the secretary of state.  None of them wanted to work for her.  They all quit over the four-year time she was in the secretary of state’s office.  None of them. 

The people that ended up on her detail were brand-new and had no idea. They were the last ones to go there because everybody else begged off, because she was just plain and simple mean and rude and disrespectful.  She was violating protocol at every turn.  As an example, one of the parent protocols is that when the secretary of state’s traveling, you get off the plane and you always join the ambassador to whatever country you’re in. The ambassador gets in a limo with you, it’s a security thing, too, from the airport into the embassy or wherever you’re going.

In other words, when you get off the plane in a foreign country, you are joined at the hip with the ambassador.  She never would do it.

The only person allowed to get closer to is Huma Abedin and whoever this guy that runs around with her, this big, big black guy who is there rubbing her back and telling her just keep talking, just keep breathing.  He’s obviously some medic, and he’s constantly around her.  Other than this guy and Huma Abedin, she just blows off everybody and everything.  You can’t find any references, or very few, to people with any affection for her.  They’re all working for her and they’re all trying to rig the game for her, but there doesn’t seem to be any affection.


Obama Cover Up

obama-email-cover-upRUSH: Now to the FBI document dump.  It’s a hundred pages and it’s dynamite, and it’s just astounding, folks.  You look at this and you wonder how in the world did this woman not get charged?  How in the world did this not get sent to the grand jury?  Of course, we know.  President Obama didn’t want it.  He didn’t want any of it going anywhere because he’s implicated in it.  He lied.  He said he learned about Hillary’s private server while watching the news just like all of us, except that’s not true.

He was regularly communicating with her via her private server and all this suspicious email activity using a fake name, a pseudonym, if you will.  He was fully aware.  And that’s why to go after her would have included him, and ah, ah, ah, ah, not going to happen.  I did as much looking into this as I could, and I have to tell you, John Hinderaker at Power Line has probably put together the best summary of this.

Yesterday “the FBI released another 100 pages relating to its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s conduct as Secretary of State.” This was not just an investigation that was limited to her emails and server.  By definition, it ended up including her conduct as secretary of state.  Why it has taken so long for the FBI to review, to redact, and publish — I mean, a hundred pages is a small quantity.  It’s dynamite.  What’s in these 100 pages, even what is not redacted is dynamite.  But the question, why it has taken so long for the FBI to review, to redact and publish a hundred pages is inexplicable.

CORRUPTION: Pressure from inside FBI to De-Classify Emails to protect Hillary

hillary-liar-emailsThe pages that were released yesterday are explosive, big-time explosive. Folks, it’s serious stuff.  And it all — you can’t conclude anything other — this woman ought not be anywhere near the levels of power.  This woman is as corrupt as anybody.  This makes Watergate, as I say, look like Romper Room.  Now, you may have seen headlines that Hillary’s State Department tried to pressure the FBI to say that various documents located on her home server were not classified.  That was critical.  It is critical, obviously, because one of Hillary’s lines of defense was to claim — falsely, as it turned out — that she never sent or received classified documents on her off-the-books email system.

“In the first page, an unidentified FBI employee says he was ‘pressured’ to change the classification of an email to render it unclassified. This pressure came from someone within the FBI.”

This is in FBI documents.  This is not somebody’s speculation.  It was in what was released yesterday.  You remember, now, she has denied trafficking in classified documents, sending or receiving.  And yet in one of the pages yesterday, an unidentified FBI employee says he was pressured by someone within the FBI to change the classification of an email to render it unclassified.

hillary-liarThis person within the FBI “who said he had been contacted by Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy, who ‘had asked his assistance in altering the email’s classification in exchange for a “quid pro quo.”‘”  You may see people denying this left and right at the State Department.  It’s in the FBI documents.  It happened!  Somebody within the FBI called over to state, talked to Patrick Kennedy and asked for his help in changing the classification of the email in exchange for a quid pro quo.

And what was the quid pro quo?  “The quid pro quo was that, if the FBI would say the email was unclassified, the State Department would allow the FBI to ‘place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.’ Subsequently, the interviewee was summoned to an ‘all agency’ meeting at the State Department to discuss the classification review of the Hillary Clinton emails. This fact,” and that’s what it is, “is astonishing: the meeting was attended by representatives of the State Department, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency ‘and other government agencies,’ including, obviously, the FBI.”

So you had an all-agency meeting at the State Department to discuss reviewing the classification of Hillary Clinton’s emails and changing from classified to unclassified, with all of these government agencies at the meeting.  “Patrick Kennedy presided. Someone asked whether any of the Hillary emails that were being reviewed for production were classified. Kennedy replied, ‘Well, we’ll see.'”

Meaning, when we get through here, after we’ve declassified a bunch of ’em, probably not.  So they had classified emails, agency-wide meeting with all of these different elements of the government to discuss declassifying certain Hillary emails.  Why would they do that?  To protect her.  To protect them.  To protect Obama.  There were classified emails.  She was trafficking in classified email on her unsecure server that she had lied about and denied doing, that Obama claimed he knew nothing about when he did.

“Following the all agency meeting, Undersecretary of State Kennedy renewed his effort to pressure the FBI to change its classification of the document in question. The FBI representative wouldn’t budge.”  The FBI said, “No, we are not gonna help you declassify this classified document.” 

“So Kennedy asked who else at the agency he could talk to. The interviewee gave the name of Michael Steinbach.” All of this was in these hundred pages dumped yesterday.  “The interviewee then participated in a call with Kennedy and Steinbach, in which Kennedy ‘continued to pressure the FBI to change the classified markings on the email to unclassified.’ Steinbach refused. What happened next is — deserves to be, anyway — a bombshell.

“Prior to ending the conversation, Kennedy,” of the State Department, “asked whether the FBI or State would conduct the public statements on the matter. Steinbach advised Kennedy that the FBI would not comment publicly on the matter.”

Well, I mean, folks, right there is corruption admitted to.  Here you had an all-agency meeting to discuss the declassification of an email in order to protect Hillary’s claim that she had not trafficked in them.  And everybody at the meeting admits to and knows what’s going on.  And the FBI says, “Don’t worry, we’re not gonna talk about it.  Steinbach of the FBI told Kennedy we would not comment publicly on the matter.”  Meaning, whatever you do, nobody’s gonna know about it. We’re not gonna blow the whistle on you.  Whatever you do, go ahead, we’re not talking. 

Clinton-Cash-Graphic-Novel-Panel“That was enough for the astonishingly corrupt Hillary Clinton. This is what happened next:  The conference call ended and, according to [ ], the Associated Press (AP) published the story within the hour. Former Secretary of State Clinton appeared in front of the press shortly thereafter to deny having sent classified emails on her private email server.”

They had just taken a classified document and agreed to declassify it just because they needed to for her, not because it deserved to be.  It was still a classified bit of information, but they declassified it, enabling her to go out and lie.  This is just one document.  How many critically important documents have been given the same treatment, have been discussed in the same way?  The State Department has put some documents, archived them way back down in the basement, nobody to ever see them again.

Folks, this is just one element of what’s in this hundred page dump.  But this one, this story illustrates the full-fledged corruption of Hillary Clinton’s State Department, working with the FBI.  She says she never trafficked in classified data, sending it or receiving it.  She said that after an agency-wide meeting, an all-agency meeting in which a document about Benghazi was declassified.


Obama Lies some More

obama-cover-up1RUSH:  Guess what, my friends?  Obama’s got a press conference, or just finished one with the prime minister of Italy in the Rose Garden.  He was asked about what I just shared with you.  Question by Kevin Freking of the AP.  “Mr. President, does it distress you that folks at the FBI and State Department talked about the proper level of classification of emails that were on Secretary Clinton’s server?  Would you acknowledge the appearance of impropriety and should the State Department officials look into this further.”

OBAMA:  You’ve heard directly from both the FBI and the State Department that the notion or the accounts that have been put out there are just not true.  And, you know, you can question them again, but based on what we have seen, heard, learned, some of the more sensational implications or appearances, as you stated them, aren’t based on actual events and based on what actually happened and I think derive from sort of overly broad characterizations of interactions between the State Department and the FBI that happen a lot.

Evidence of Intent

ObamaHillaryLyingtoAmericaWhistleBlowerCALLER:  Thank you for taking my call, and thank you for all you’re doing.  I think you’re doing a fantastic job at making this all surface.  And what I want to say is that I agree with (unintelligible) at the end of the FBI investigation Comey saying there was no evidence of Hillary’s intent.  Doesn’t this prove Hillary’s intent?

RUSH:  Oh, for crying out loud, great point.  Abso-freaking-lutely.  The whole no — look, Alice, we know — I’ve got 15 things I want to say here at once, I gotta dial it back.  We know, common sense, intelligence guided by experience tells us before we know any of this that Hillary Clinton intended to do exactly what she did!  This is just confirming it!

And it wasn’t just Hillary Clinton.  There were all kinds of people intending to rig this whole classified versus unclassified documents on her email thing, on her server thing so that she could go out and tell a lie and get away with it.  They were actually having meetings over declassifying classified documents.  This hundred page document dump from the FBI yesterday, folks, it’s loaded.  I’ve only gotten to one aspect of it, and that’s the big meeting.



FBI Document Dump Proves This Woman Has No Business Anywhere Near Power



Truth Zone: Media lies, cover ups of Obama’s Iran hostage ransom money

Truth Zone:

Media Lies, Cover Ups of  Obama’s Iran Hostage Ransom Money

Rush Limbaugh

obama-IranAffordable-Ransom-Act-CHe said (summarized), “There was nothing nefarious about this deal.”  There wasn’t?  There wasn’t anything nefarious? So the Iranians want $400 million; they have four or five of our sailors.  They tell us they’ll release them when we pay up.  But we can’t use US dollars because of sanctions — meaning to do this, we have to break the law, if we can’t use US dollars.  So Obama then goes and arranges somehow to get $400 million from somewhere.  Now, normally maybe there’s a… What do you call it?  What do businesses call…? The petty cash drawer.

Maybe there’s a petty cash drawer in the White House that’s got a couple of billion in there, and Obama can use it in a discretionary way. (interruption) Yeah, “Obama stash.”  Anyway, he comes up with $400 million, and then it’s in foreign currency.  Some of it is Swiss Francs.  Some of it is in Euros.  I forget what other denominations or what other currencies are used, but it totals $400 million.  We put it on a pallet. We put it on a plane. We fly the plane over there.  The plane lands under cover of darkness. 

The hostages are on the tarmac awaiting the arrival of that airplane and that cash before the Iranians will release them.  One of the hostages was told, “You can’t leave here until that plane arrives.” The hostage says, “What plane?”  “Never you mind,” the Iranians say. “But there’s a plane coming, it’s got some stuff on it, and until it gets here and until we offload the stuff on it, you can’t leave.” Well, the plane lands; they offload the pallet of $400 million, again under cover of darkness — and again, nobody knew it at the time.


(Thanks to A.F. Branco at Legal Insurrection)

“This was an advanced payment for Iran on some of their infrastructure rebuilding.” I said, “You mean like the stimulus package that we had of close to a trillion dollars back in 2009 for the exact same reason?  Rebuild our roads.  Rebuild our bridges.  Rebuild our schools.  The fact is that none of that stimulus money went to any of those. Isn’t it amazing how often “infrastructure” is used to justify the expenditure of a lot of money that otherwise wouldn’t make any sense?

The big story is not what every single American on foreign soil is now at risk for kidnapping because the Obama regime has paid ransom. 


Thanks to A.F. Branco at Legal Insurrection for another great cartoon

In this case, it happened to be Iranian infrastructure: Roads, bridges, schools, and so forth.  Well, in the midst of all of this, Donald Trump claimed that he saw video of the cash on the pallet being unloaded.  Now, we know that it happened.  We know the cash arrived.  We know the cash arrived under cover of darkness.  We know that the Iranians accepted it.  We know the Iranians called it “ransom”! We know we paid it.  The White House is admitting we paid it.  They’re just saying, “It wasn’t ransom.”

So we know an airplane with $400 million in cash currency landed in Iran, that that pallet was offloaded and given to the ayatollahs.  We know that that happened! Trump says he saw a video of it.  Turns out, he was mistaken.  He saw a video of something on Fox News but it wasn’t this.  What is the news today?  What is the news? In the Drive-By Media, what is big story today?  It is that Donald Trump lied about seeing a video of $400 million being paid as ransom to the Iranians for the release of hostages.

The big story of the day is Donald Trump mistaking a video on Fox News as the Obama plane delivering Obama’s $400 million in hard currency ransom.  The big story is not Obama paying ransom for hostages, because the big story is Donald Trump mistakenly saying he saw a video.

KerrybloodyhandsThe big story is not even Obama denying that it was ransom, even though it was.  The big story is not Hillary and John Kerry and the press secretary all lying about it.  They’ve all said, “It wasn’t ransom!” They’ve all said, “There’s nothing to see here.”  They’ve all said, “It wasn’t nefarious.”  But that wasn’t the big story.  The big story is that Trump tweeted out that he actually saw a video of this happening.

The big story is not that one of the hostages says that their plane didn’t take off until after the money plane had landed. 

I mean, the hostage has reported that they were on a tarmac, they were ready to leave, and the Iranian strongmen said, “You can’t leave until the plane arrives.”  “Why?”  “Well, you just can’t.  There’s a plane coming in here for us.  It has something on it.  And until we get that something off of it for us, you can’t leave.”  That’s not the big story.  The big story is Donald Trump saying he saw a video of all of this happening.

ObamaPlaneCoyoteExpressThe big story is not Barack Obama using the plural “payments” at the Pentagon yesterday.  What, payments?  This was not ransom, but it was part of payments? Payments for what?  Did Congress authorize these payments?  Is this the $1.7 billion in total, and is this part of or in addition to the $150 billion that we have unfrozen for them?  Regardless, that’s not the story.  The big story is that Donald Trump claims to have seen a video of what we know happened.

The big story is not asking where Obama got the $400 million. 

The big story is not asking how Obama laundered the $400 million and turned it into Swiss and Euro currency.  There seems to be no interest in any of that.  The big story is that Donald Trump mistakenly saw a video of all of this happening.  The big story is not that anybody else who found a way to launder money and use it this way, would have already been charged with something and maybe in jail.  No, no, no! Of course not.  That’s not the story. Don’t be ridiculous.

The big story is Donald Trump says he saw a video.


media-liesThat’s not a story.  It’s not a factor.  We’re not even warning anybody, “Be careful, you could be next,” because the big story is that Donald Trump said he saw a video of this all happening.  We know it happened.  And the big story is not the video on YouTube done by Iran to brag of the payment!  There is a video.  The Iranians have the video on YouTube bragging about the ransom they collected.

“On Wednesday, CNN’s New Day,” “devoted nearly 200 times more coverage to alleged scandals involving Donald Trump than it did to the … $400 million [ransom] payment the Obama [Regime] sent to Iran …”  Two! Hundred! Times! 

We ask, “Why doesn’t this hostage story…? Why does this ransom story…? Why doesn’t it cause people to get angry?”  Because, folks, they don’t know about it.  Apparently, a majority of Americans are not even hearing about it. They don’t even know about this story.   


Election 2016: Liberal lies, cover ups, and Voter Fraud in California

Election 2016:

Liberal lies, cover ups, and Voter Fraud in California

The Zombie Voter Apocalypse: California Refuses to Admit Its Voter Fraud Problem

Hans von Spakovsky

Jana Minich

vote-fraud2Hollywood has always loved making films about the walking dead, but in Southern California it appears they have a real life problem with “zombie” voters.

An investigation by CBSLA2 and KCAL9 found that hundreds of deceased persons are still on voter registration rolls in the area, and that many of these names have been voting for years in Los Angeles.

Julita Abutin, died in 2006 but voted in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014.

For example, John Cenkner died in 2003, according to Social Security Administration records, yet he voted in the 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008, and 2010 elections. His daughter told the station that she was “astounded” and couldn’t “understand how anybody” could get

CBS reports that California is the only state that does not comply with the Help America Vote Act of 2002, something the Obama administration has basically ignored.

Another voter, Julita Abutin, died in 2006 but voted in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. According to CBS, the county confirmed they have “signed vote-by-mail envelopes” from Abutin since she passed away. So either someone has been forging her signature or her ghost has quite an earthly presence.

The investigation revealed that 265 deceased persons voted in Southern California, 215 of them in Los Angeles County. Thirty-two were repeat voters, with eight posthumously-cast ballots each. One woman who died in 1988 has been voting for 26 years, including in the 2014 election.

vote-fraud1This report comes 20 years after the contested election of Rep. Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif., from this same area. An investigation by a U.S. House committee found that hundreds of illegal ballots were cast by noncitizens and improper absentee ballots.

In that 1996 election, when she defeated incumbent Bob Dornan, a winning margin of 979 votes was whittled down to only 35 votes or fewer when that voter fraud was factored in. In cases like these, where elections are decided by only a small number of votes, the harmful effects of voter fraud are most obvious.

Yet here, two decades later, California has still not taken the necessary steps to ensure the reliability of its electoral system.

As a result of the investigation, Los Angeles County supervisors called for an investigation into the findings. Even if these particular zombie voters did not change the outcome of an election, each fraudulently cast ballot stole and diluted the vote of a legitimate voter.

Cases like these and many others show that voter fraud is a real phenomenon and a potential threat to the integrity of the election process.

liesThe Los Angeles County Registrar pointed to the 1200 to 2000 voter registrations removed every month to update records and told reporters, “There’s really no way to connect a person whose death is recorded with a person who is registered to vote unless we get some kind of notification from the family.”

But that is plain nonsense. Other states do frequent comparisons between their voter registration lists and the death databases maintained by the Social Security Administration, and other state agencies consult vital records departments in order to remove voters who have died.

The CBS investigation shows both that voter fraud exists and that this type of fraudulent voting is detectable through proper investigation.

CBS reports that California is the only state that does not comply with the Help America Vote Act of 2002, something the Obama administration has basically ignored.

The Help America Vote Act establishes mandatory minimum standards of accuracy for state voter registration lists and requires states to engage in regular maintenance and updates to remove ineligible voters who die or move away.

California is obviously not complying with these requirements.