Fact Sheet: Capitalism and Freedom

Dinner Topics for Monday

Fact Sheet: Capitalism and Freedom

Month-Defining Moment

economic-freedom-low-scoreSee Heritage Foundation Economic Rankings of countries of the world, freedom ratios









5 Liberal Lies about American Capitalism

Rush Limbaugh

(Limbaugh Letter, August 2015, p. 11)

SM_stossel_capitalism_works-800x600Lie #1: Capitalism doesn’t work.


Capitalism is the only economic system in history that creates wealth for the entire society. After 1776, the U.S. led the world in prosperity.

Lie #2: American capitalism hurts America’s poor.


Thanks to capitalism, America’s poor are wealthier than 70 percent of the world. A typical poor America household has a car, air conditioning, two wide-screen TVs, cable or satellite TV, computer, cell phones, Xbox, washer, dryer, all kitchen appliances including microwave and coffee maker, and more living space than the average European.

Bottom 5% in U.S. have higher income than top 5% in India.


capitalismLie #3: American capitalism hurts the world’s poor.


American free enterprise is lifting the world out of poverty.

Lie #4: Under capitalism, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.


In countries with the most economic freedom—capitalism—everyone is richer.

free-enterprise-capitalismLie #5: American capitalism runs on greed.


Americans donate more out of their own resources to charity than do any other people on earth.

Americans donate more than 10% of GDP. Other nations reach a mere 6% or less.


Why are Republicans offering no opposition to the liberal agenda? They are bought.

Corporate Welfare—Republicans guilty of it, too

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. ~Edmund Burke

It has to be money.  The Treasury is there. It’s the easiest access. Whether it’s K Street, the lobbyists, everybody’s going for the money.  We now have we call it crony corporatism or crony socialism.  It’s just cronyism, period.  Like we discussed with Ted Cruz. What in the world is Boeing…? The Export-Import Bank is a classic example. It’s a New Deal thing. It needs to go the way of the Edsel. All it is, is corporate welfare.  Let me try this on you.

The term “corporate welfare,” I first heard that when liberals used it speaking of it with hatred and derision.  Now guess what?  Corporate welfare is something in a Republicans, conservatives are railing against because they find their own elected officials engaging in it.  Corporate welfare used to be just a standard rant from the left against capitalism.  Corporate welfare was one of the ways they attempted to denigrate capitalism.

Capitalism is NOT Corporate Welfare and Cronyism

Cronyism and this kind of thing is not part of capitalism.  This is big governmentitis.  It’s just been decided that Big Business CEOs have found an easier route to money by getting in bed with powerful Washington government people rather than competing in the open market.  It isn’t capitalism doing this.  There is no “unfettered” or any other kind of capitalism going on here, when you talk about cronyism.

When you have take your pick of any big corporation getting in bed with Obama, be it the insurance business and Obamacare, be it Big Pharmaceutical and Obamacare, be it the doctors or nurses associaciated with Obamacare, we all can see what’s happens here is, people are being bought.  They’re being promised exemptions from the hardest, most punishing aspects of the legislation if they’ll support it. This kind of cronyism…

redistsocialismillustratedAs Cruz pointed, Boeing have already been granted all kinds of concessions with labor strain and so forth, being allowed to open factories in South Carolina, nonunion states. What do they need with…? Why is a corporation guaranteed loans.  Well, when you realize there’s an old adage — use everybody’s money but your own whenever you can — then it all makes sense.  The biggest collection of money in the country is not the Koch brothers, and it’s not Warren Buffett. It’s not Bill Gates.

It’s the United States Treasury.

That’s the biggest pile of money in the country, and if you can have a direct line to that by an association with the president or other powerful members of Congress, why not take it?  And if anybody establishes that the door is open and under which deals and arrangements can be made as Obama has done with GE and Solyndra and any of these other industries he got in bed with, well, once the door is open, you can expect all kinds of people try to walk through it, too.

Remember the example I gave not long ago: Walmart.

Everybody thinks Walmart’s a big, conservative, Arkansas major corporation. A major business that doesn’t want the government involved in their business.  Walmart all of a sudden out of the blue one day started supporting A, Obamacare, and, B, an increase in the minimum wage.  I said, “Now, wait a minute, now. In terms of policy, this doesn’t make any sense. In the old days, no corporation worth its salt would agree with any government that wanted to force Obamacare on it and require its minimum wage to go up.”

But what Walmart decided was they’ve got the money to do both; their competitors don’t.  So getting in bed with government. Supporting the minimum wage might put your competitors out of business, ’cause they can’t afford it.  If you can put your competitors out of business with an alliance of government instead of having to outcompete them in the market, what are you gonna do?  If you can raise your stock price by getting in bed with government rather than competing in the open market, what are you gonna do?

Well, that’s what’s happening.


Divorce, Church, and Happy Marriage

Dinner Topics for Wednesday

The real threat to marriage

Anne Reed (American Family Association)

keySo, in Christian marriage, be encouraged. It is Christ who created all things and who designed marriage for His good purpose. In this world, we will have trouble. But He sent encouragement:
“[T]ake heart! I have overcome the world.”

In the end, Feldhahn’s research pronounces with clarity, “You can believe in marriage.”


FACT SHEET SUMMARY: Contrary to conventional thinking …

▶ The actual divorce rate has never gotten close to 50%.

▶ Those who attend church regularly have a significantly lower divorce rate than those who don’t.

▶ Most marriages are happy.

▶ Simple changes make a big difference in most marriage problems.

▶ Most remarriages succeed.


marriageMarriage: It’s in the news. Whether it’s judicial overreaches redefining it, breakups, nasty divorces, or lawsuits, the news is bad wherever you turn – including the pulpit and the counseling office.

Some believe marriage is on its way out – a dying institution, a global failure. But is it really? Have we been bamboozled by easy-release figures that support pessimistic attitudes about God’s design for human relationships?

With more than half of marriages ending in divorce in and out of the church, we can only expect an escalating trend to continue, right? The 50% divorce rate stat has spread far and wide. And it has wielded a heavy dose of disillusionment along the way.

However, according to author Shaunti Feldhahn, a Harvard University trained Wall Street analyst and social researcher, the truth about marriage and divorce presents an altogether fresh and surprisingly hopeful picture. In her book The Good News about Marriage: Debunking Discouraging Myths about Marriage and Divorce, she contends, “Divorce is not the biggest threat to marriage. Discouragement is.” She believes the widespread sense of hopelessness is brought on, at least in part, by false information.

But how can this be? Where did the 50% number come from? It has streamed from every outlet. The question rattled through Feldhahn’s thoughts as she struggled to complete an article. What started as a simple task to source the commonly accepted stat turned into exasperation and an eight year research project that she describes as “a rigorous, fair, and accurate attempt to reclaim a whole other side of the truth about marriage.”

The real deal

happymarriagecoupleShe has finally discovered the divorce rate in America is nowhere close to 50%. And it never has been. As a matter of fact, the rate has been steadily declining since 1980. In reality, 71% of women are still married to their first spouse. And widowhood reduces the remaining 29%, bringing us to an approximate 25% divorce rate for first marriages.


Additionally, Feldhahn told AFA Journal, the rate of divorce is not the same among Christians. Previously reported numbers were based solely on belief systems (stated religion) and not whether those beliefs were churchattendanceactually being practiced in their lives. With the help of Barna Group’s comprehensive research from 2008, Feldhahn and her staff were able to incorporate participants’ answers about church attendance. The results revealed a 27% decrease in the number of divorces among those who had been to church in the last seven days.

Landmark findings by the National Survey of Families and Households between 1987 and 1994 revealed a 50% lesser occasion of divorce among those who share the same faith and attend church. A Family Life Family Needs Survey among more than 50 churches in 2012-2013 found that only 22% of those ever married had been divorced. Numbers vary, but no matter which way you cut it, divorce in the church is lower. And divorce overall is much lower than the numbers pushed by secular media and others.

Just move in

Divorce has declined and found a steady, straight road. But according to a Pew Research poll, barely half of Americans are currently married – only 51% of adults age 18 and older compared to 72% reported in 1960. So, are the decreasing numbers of divorce due to corresponding lower numbers of those participating in marriage in the first place?

It is difficult to argue otherwise. However, a number of other considerations at work in society are turning the idea on its ear. divorcetroubledcoupleFor instance, the age at which marriage occurs is increasingly reaching higher numbers. Because young-age marriage correlates strongly with a high divorce rate, the deferral of marriage serves to further reduce the divorce rate.

In addition, cohabitation has seen a significant rise over the last 20 years. Live-in situations create and further a noncommittal, easy-out attitude that spills into marital relationships. This increase brings to the surface a higher likelihood of divorce for those who live together before marriage.

Pew research found in 2010 that 61% of people who have never been married have a desire for marriage in the future. And with good news about marriage bursting from the ranks of American households, it is no wonder it remains a sought-after establishment.

Life at home

happymarriagewordsMarriages are happy. It is true. About 80% of marriages overall are happy, and more than a third go beyond the “happy” mark, overflowing into the “very happy” category.

Of those currently in struggling marriages, 80% will still be married five years later. And solid, hopeful encouragement exists within those stats. “A landmark study found that if you wait five years, eight in ten people say they are very happy five years later,” said Feldhahn.

“Most couples don’t mind the idea of working hard at marriage,” she said. “What discourages them is the idea that marriage itself is inherently hard and complicated, or that working hard won’t pay off.”

When one spouse is less than happy, 82% of the time the other spouse is simply unaware of it. The culprit is typically a stockpile of misunderstandings, conflict, and hurt feelings that materialize over time and cause a rift between the two. It is rarely intentional. More than 99% of married people care deeply about their spouse, and 93% would marry their spouse again. In most cases, having a good marriage or improving a struggling marriage doesn’t require couples to “solve deep, systemic issues,” explained Feldhahn. “Instead, small changes can and do make a big difference.”

Feldhahn took a look at remarriage as well. Any search on the internet turns up 60% and 73% divorce rates, respectively, for second and third marriages. An exhaustive search found no such evidence, leaving Feldhahn to conclude the numbers are nothing more than “urban legend.” According to the Census Bureau, 65% of women in second marriages are still married to their second spouse. And because second and third marriages tend to occur later in life, the percentage of those marriages ended by death is expected to be higher than first marriages, resulting in a second marriage divorce rate of 30% or less.

Hope, enormous implications

Now that the dark compilation of deceptive figures has been dismantled, it is easier to see the beautiful and imperfect gem on which Feldhahn based her statement, “Divorce is not the biggest threat to marriage. Discouragement is.”

christs-outstreched-hand-lindsleySo, in Christian marriage, be encouraged. It is Christ who created all things and who designed marriage for His good purpose. In this world, we will have trouble. But He sent encouragement:
“[T]ake heart! I have overcome the world.”

In the end, Feldhahn’s research pronounces with clarity, “You can believe in marriage.”


SUMMARY: Contrary to conventional thinking …

▶ The actual divorce rate has never gotten close to 50%.

▶ Those who attend church regularly have a significantly lower divorce rate than those who don’t.

▶ Most marriages are happy.

▶ Simple changes make a big difference in most marriage problems.

▶ Most remarriages succeed.


The Good News about Marriage: Debunking Discouraging Myths about Marriage and Divorce by Shaunti Feldhahn with Tally Whitehead