Gallery

Birthright Citizenship definition: Birthright Citizenship vs. 14th Amendment, US Constitution

This gallery contains 4 photos.

Birthright Citizenship definition: Birthright Citizenship vs. 14th Amendment, US Constitution Donald Trump Takes Aim at Birthright Citizenship   Rush Limbaugh Our Constitution was written so that mistakes at the founding could be corrected. The vast majority of people knew slavery … Continue reading

Gallery

History Facts: Immigration in America; Immigration Caravan vs. Disease Control

This gallery contains 6 photos.

History Facts: Immigration in America; Immigration Caravan vs. Disease Control “America is a welcoming country,” President Trump said from the Roosevelt Room of the White House. “We will not allow our generosity to be abused by those who would break … Continue reading

Culture Wars: Church and State Issues and Illegal Immigration

Culture Wars: Church and State Issues and Illegal Immigration

 

Critical Thinking

church-state2-reaganChurch and State: Where do we draw the Line?

C .A. Davidson

The overall responsibility of our nation is to protect her citizens from foreign invasion and crimes against other citizens, and to uphold Constitutional law. We already have laws governing immigration and citizenship.

No matter what your religion, you are still subject to the laws of the land which are in place to protect civilized society. Most religions are generally peace-loving, abiding by moral laws based on the Ten Commandments. Other than Islam (and in some countries, atheism, which is also a religion), I don’t know of other religions which condone rape, murder, deceit, and the suppression of free speech.      American citizens have freedom of religion, as long as they don’t infringe on the rights and freedoms of others. Churches can excommunicate a member for church-state1-madison-quoteimmoral conduct, but cannot put a person in prison. If someone commits a crime that endangers society, such as stealing or murder, it is no longer a Church issue—it becomes the jurisdiction of the State. That person is subject to the laws of the land, no matter what his religion. We have seen Christians put in prison for committing crimes. That is as it should be for Muslims as well, or for any other religion. The minute your religion violates another person’s life or property, it becomes political.

Furthermore, whereas citizens are required to abide by the law, illegal immigrants are already outside the law. The policy of Open Borders should not even be debatable, as it is inherently illegal.

In the following article, Ed Vitagliano does much to clarify the line between church and state, religion and politics.

Immigration: thinking biblically

Ed Vitagliano

bible-word-of-godAs we wrestle with such weighty matters, it is critical that Christians turn to Scripture for guidance as much as possible.

Some Christians believe the Bible is clear on these matters, citing Old Testament passages such as Leviticus 19:34: “The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God” (NIV).

From the New Testament, some Christians argue that the command to love your neighbor requires America – a so-called Christian nation – to help those in need.

However, if we are concerned with “accurately handling the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15*), here are some things to remember:

  1. Biblical passages that address individual Christians – or the church – don’t necessarily apply to governments.
    There is no doubt that Christ commanded Christians to be generous, to care for those in need, and to love our neighbor.

However, does this apply to government programs? May Christians who have the power to vote – as do those in the West – use that power to bring the government into the equation? Absolutely.

welfare-government-charity-madisonHowever, must Christians vote to do so? And if Christians do vote to do so, how much government activity should we demand? How much tax money should be allocated? What sort of programs must we call for? Food stamps only? Job training programs? Is there ever a time when someone should cease getting aid?

These questions are vexing, but here’s the problem: At this point the Bible ceases to be a guide.

Instead, at this point it becomes a matter of sound judgment, not biblical injunction. Christians, like everyone else, make their case in the public square and attempt to persuade others to join them.

Here is the principle: Biblically speaking, the government is not the same as the individual Christian, and it is not the same as the church. Therefore, believers must be careful not to apply to government Scriptures intended for the church.

For example, Jesus said, “For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you” (Matthew 6:14).

ImmigrationCriminalsSo, we must conclude that individual Christians are to forgive their enemies. But must we also conclude that governments should forgive their enemies? Must we demand that criminals convicted of crimes be released and not sent to prison?

The application of this principle is that individual Christians should help refugees who are in our nation. But the issue of who we allow in – and how many – is not a biblical matter. It is a political matter.

  1. Understanding the proper biblical function of government is critical to this debate.
    Many Christians fail to understand the purpose of government in a fallen world, and they act as if the matter is irrelevant to Christians focused on the eternal kingdom. But God has ordained government to serve His purposes on the earth as surely as He has ordained the church to carry out its assigned role.

Romans 13 makes plain the fact that governments derive their authority from God and are considered ministers or servants of Yahweh (vv. 1, 4). They help order human existence, represent the authority of God Himself, restrain evil, and reward good.

Therefore one must assume that a government has both the right and the responsibility before God to maintain order. Surely that would include providing for national borders – which might require restricting immigration and the flow of refugees across them.

More than Platitudes

trojan-horse-isisU.S. ever seem to wrestle with this matter. Invariably their responses are: “Yes, of course, the government should establish secure borders and enforce laws, but ….”

Such a proclamation is not helpful. In fact, it does not wrestle with the subtleties of the issue at all. A viable resolution requires more than platitudes.

We need these questions answered: Should a government allow every refugee who wants to enter the country to do so? No? Then exactly how should a government decide who and how many?

If a Christian insists that “love your neighbor” requires us (as a country) to accept, say, more Syrian refugees, then that Christian cannot restrict the refugee process at all. The moment a Christian says a government can be loving and restrict the refugee process, the Christian has then admitted that the political process must take place. In other words, the government must be allowed to do its job.

But if it does its job and restricts the refugee process, that Christian cannot argue that the country is no longer being loving. Why? Because the Bible does not quantify how many refugees a country must allow. Once again, that is a matter of sound judgment, rather than a biblical command.

  1. Old Testament passages dealing with immigration, refugees, or foreigners in Israel do not apply to our current political debates.
    It is clear that Old Testament passages (e.g., Leviticus 19:34) required God’s people to love and treat respectfully non-Jews who were living among them or passing through.

However, such verses merely assume that certain people would fall into those categories because transient peoples were common in the ancient world. Virtually all societies, and especially those in that part of the world – in the middle of major trade routes – were quite used to seeing trade caravans passing through and foreigners who stayed for a few months conducting business.

These biblical references instruct God’s people to treat lovingly those who were already passing through. The more likely parallel would be: How should Christians today treat legal immigrants who are in our midst?

  1. Passages that apply to Israel do not always apply to other nations like the U.S.
    It is probably safe to assume that Leviticus 19:34 requires Christians not only to help the foreigners already in their midst, but also to press their government to do likewise.

israel_flagSometimes the moral force behind a commandment given to Israel is universal in its application. But this is not always the case. Great care should be exercised when attempting to stretch a passage that might apply only to Israel and make it universally binding.

2 Chronicles 7:14 is a classic example of a promise made to Israel that evangelicals often stretch to apply to America – or some other nation.

There are certainly principles in 2 Chronicles 7:14 that should encourage American Christians to repent and pray and seek revival for their land. But it is not a covenant promise from God. He has not obligated Himself to save America as He obligated Himself to respond to the prayers of His people in the Old Testament.

I respectfully disagree with Mr. Vitagliano on this particular point. America is a choice land, with a Constitution created by men raised up by God for that purpose. References to Zion may even include America. Isaiah prophesied for all time, especially for our time. He said, “Out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” (Isaiah 2:3) God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. He keeps His promises; He favors the righteous, but not any particular race. He has already blessed America greatly because of our Judeo-Christian culture. Why wouldn’t He honor, even empower, our efforts for a revival? ~C.D.

As the immigration debate demonstrates, there is nothing simple about trying to interpret the Bible in the often overheated atmosphere of the culture wars of 2015. If we are to sort out the implications of such issues, it will require that all of us in the body of Christ jump into the debate.

The worst thing we can do is to accuse our brothers and sisters of disobeying Christ or not loving their neighbors when we disagree. Unity in the body of Christ is imperative if we are to be the light He commands us to be.

*Unless otherwise noted, the New American Standard Version is used throughout this article.

Culture Wars: Huge Protest March in Germany vs. Angela Merkel, Islam, Illegal Immigration

Culture Wars: 

Huge Protest March in Germany vs. Angela Merkel, Islam, Illegal Immigration

Thousands March on Anti-Mass Migration PEGIDA’s Second Anniversary

Western Civilization at Stake. PEGIDA, a German-language acronym for Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West, has staged weekly protests in Dresden since 2014. Attendance peaked at around 25,000 early last year. Durchgezaehlt, a local group that estimates turnout, put Sunday’s attendance at between 6,500 and 8,500.

Breitbart London

pegida-anti-immigration-dresden2BERLIN (AP) — Several thousand people have turned out for a demonstration in the eastern German city of Dresden marking the second anniversary of the anti-Islam and anti-immigration group PEGIDA.

Police brought in reinforcements from other German states to prevent trouble at the PEGIDA event Sunday and at smaller counter-protests. They reported no significant incidents, news agency dpa reported.

pegida-anti-immigration-dresden3Speakers assailed the approach of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government to the migrant crisis, to chants of “Merkel must go.”

PEGIDA, a German-language acronym for Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West, has staged weekly protests in Dresden since 2014. Attendance peaked at around 25,000 early last year. Durchgezaehlt, a local group that estimates turnout, put Sunday’s attendance at between 6,500 and 8,500.

PEGIDA spawned similar though less successful groups elsewhere in Germany.

pegida-anti-immigration-dresden

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/10/17/thousands-march-anti-mass-migration-pegidas-second-anniversary/

National Security: Trump, Illegal Immigration, and the Trojan Horse

National Security:

Trump, Illegal Immigration, and the Trojan Horse

American Thinker:

Trump sees the Trojan Horse

Posted by Ann Corcoran on September 26, 2016

stealth jihad-a Trojan horse

stealth jihad-a Trojan horse

There is a good article about the Hijra by Ted Belman at American Thinker yesterday. Here are the opening paragraphs:

Image: Actually the Ottoman Turks (the Muslims) were ultimately defeated at the Gates of Vienna in 1683. Polish Hussars, pictured here, pushed the Turks back on SEPTEMBER 11-12, 1683 freeing the Austrians and sparing Germany. Unfortunately, the Muslims are back today as so-called “refugees” being welcomed to take Europe without a fight.

Stealth Jihad

Ever wonder why there are so many Muslims and Muslim countries in the world? Over the millennia many countries were conquered, but didn’t remain Persian or Greek or Roman as the case may be. You see, the countries conquered in the name of Islam, became and remained Islamic. For example Pakistan, part of India, and Malaysia both were Hindu; Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Egypt and N. Africa were Christian; Afghanistan was Buddhist. They are all Islamic now.

Syrian refugees entering Europe

Syrian refugees entering Europe

This transformation was not by chance but by design. All these countries were conquered by force then shorn of their wealth and many of their women. Then the Muslim conquerors introduced Sharia and continued fighting the local inhabitants. The inhabitants were either forced to convert or accorded Dhimmi status. As time went on all cultures submitted and eventually became Islamic.

The advance of Islam was finally reversed in Spain and stopped at the Gates of Vienna in 1642 [Not sure about 1642, here is the final battle in 1683. More here—ed]. Thereafter the power of Islam went into decline but other than Spain, it never lost its hold on the people it conquered. This decline was reversed in the Twentieth Century when Arabs became wealthy as a result of their vast oil reserves. This wealth was then deployed to conquer the west, not by Violent Jihad, but by Stealth Jihad.

This design was referred to as The Islamic Doctrine.

The Islamists know and understand their history better than we do!  I bet they are laughing their heads off about the success they are having invading Europe today Interesting isn’t it that Poland is one of the few European countries that ‘gets it’ and isn’t inviting in the Muslim ‘refugees.’ ~Anne Corcoran

 

https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2016/09/26/american-thinker-trump-sees-the-trojan-horse/

National Security: Trump Immigration vetting backed by Immigrants 2 to 1, per Poll Results

National Security:

Poll Results—Trump Immigration vetting backed by Immigrants 2 to 1

Morning Consult Poll: Americans, Immigrants Back Donald Trump’s Immigration Vetting Policy By More Than 2 to 1

Americans and immigrants support Donald Trump’s calls for the ideological vetting of would-be immigrants by more than two-to-one, according to a new poll from Morning Consult.

cartoon-EGG-ImmigrationThanks to A.F. Branco at Legal Insurrection for his great cartoon

That’s bad news for Hillary Clinton and her allied progressives, who are trying to persuade swing-voters that Trump’s policy for immigrants are extreme and bigoted.

The “strong” numbers are especially important, because they suggest how many people will make up their mind based on that issue. That’s to Trump’s advantages, because his “strong” numbers are 38 percent support to 15 percent strong opposition.

Among actual immigrants, his strong numbers are above two-to-one — or 31 percent strong support to 12 percent strong opposition.

So he’s got 61 strong or “somewhat” support from actual immigrants, compared to just 29 percent strong and somewhat opposition. That’s two-to-one support, which allows Trump to claim that his policies are supported by a consensus of recent immigrants. Ten percent declined to comment.

trump-illegal-immigration-validatedTrump outlined his call for vetting of immigrants on Aug. 15, amid growing concern over jihad attacks by Islamic migrants.  “To put these new procedures in place, we will have to temporarily suspend immigration from some of the most dangerous and volatile regions of the world that have a history of exporting terrorism … I will ask the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security to identify a list of regions where adequate screening cannot take place. We will stop processing visas from those areas until such time as it is deemed safe to resume based on new circumstances or new procedures.”

“Immigration officers will also have their powers restored: those who are guests in our country that are preaching hate will be asked to return home,” he said.

If enacted, Trump’s policies would expand existing rules which require would-be immigrants to disavow links to terrorist groups, the Nazi Party of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Trump’s popular proposal caused shock among progressives. “Donald Trump Proposes Ideological Test For Entry To The United States,” declared The Huffington Post. “Trump’s Ideological Vetting Plan Would Banish Most Republicans,” said a Muslim writer at The Daily Beast.

The poll was conducted from August 16-17 and consisted of 2,001 registered voters. Read the full survey here.

 

Poll: Immigrants Back Donald Trump’s Immigration Vetting Policy By More Than 2 to 1

National Security: Trump Foreign Policy puts American Safety First vs. Radical Islam

National Security:

Trump Foreign Policy puts American Safety First vs. Radical Islam

We’re Importing Radical Islam

keyWhat I want is common sense. I want a mainstream immigration that promotes American values. ~Donald Trump

Moroni had kept the commandments of God in preparing for the safety of his people. ~Alma 49:27

 

Related Post:

Sharia Definition—It’s about Islamic supremacism

Breitbart: Trump: Hillary ‘Wants To Be America’s Angela Merkel’

Donald Trump: Only admit immigrants “who share our values and respect our people”

On his Monday radio show, conservative talker Mark Levin, once a staunch opponent of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, praised Trump for a speech he had given earlier in the day in Youngstown, OH outlining how he would handle the threat of terrorism on the homeland.

sharia-no-america                “If you do not accept the Constitution as the law of the land, but you accept Sharia as the law of the land, you don’t get to come here,” he said. “Because you cannot assimilate. You will not assimilate. You do not get to come to the United States of America. You don’t have a birthright if you are born outside of the United States to come into the United States. And it seems to me this is just a basic standard. It’s not a high wall.”

“We should only admit into this country those who share our values and respect our people,” he said. “In addition to screening out all members or sympathizers of terrorist groups, we must also screen out any who have hostile attitudes towards our country or its principles – or who believe that Sharia law should supplant American law. Those who do not believe in our Constitution, or who support bigotry and hatred, will not be admitted.”

Rudolph Giuliani: No “successful radical Islamic terrorist attacks” in U.S. before Obama’s presidency

 

Rush Limbaugh

Latest ISIS Atrocity

ISIS, by the way, their latest atrocity… Did you hear about this? (interruption) Yeah.  ISIS found a bunch of people in Iraq that they claim were working for the Iraqi government. The six citizens of Iraq denied it, said they weren’t working for the government.  ISIS said, “Screw you! We think you are,” and they boiled them in tar.

In public! They boiled them in tar.  And this group has openly said, “Oh, yeah. We got a bunch of our guys in that bunch of Syrian refugees that are gonna be admitted into your country,” and the party that’s got the borders open and welcoming all that into the country is the Democrat Party, and here’s Donald Trump over here saying, “Unh-uh.  Not on my watch.

Trump: Join with our Allies to halt the spread of radical Islam

israel_flagTRUMP:  When I become president, the era of nation building will be brought to a very swift and decisive end.  (applause) A new approach which must be shared by both parties in America, by our allies overseas, and by our friends in the Middle East must be to halt the spread of radical Islam. (applause)

TRUMP:  All actions should be oriented around this goal, and any country which shares this goal will be our ally.  Some don’t share this goal.  We cannot always choose our friends, but we can never fail to recognize our enemies.

Immigration Facts

1924-1965, a 41 year ban

illegal-immigration-differenceRUSH:  You know, the Drive-Bys are just so bent out of shape over what they think is Trump’s extreme vetting policies when it comes to deciding who gets admitted to the country and who doesn’t.  It’s like everything else.  It’s like immigration.  There are so many things about immigration people don’t know. 

Do you realize from 1924 to 1965 there wasn’t any immigration?  Every time I say this, it reaches people who’ve never heard it and can’t believe it.  From 1924 to 1965 zip, zero, nada immigration.  It was thought that we needed that much time to assimilate all the people who emigrated to the country beginning in the late 1800s through World War I and so forth, Ellis Island, they came in through many different ports of call.  And they had to be assimilated.

And all Trump is saying is, any undesirables, you want to come into this country and kill Americans, we’re not gonna let you.  And we’re gonna interview you and vet you, and we’re gonna find out.  If you come from a religious belief or political belief that thinks America is the enemy and you need to kill them or discriminate, we’re not gonna let you in.  I would think that would be very important to gays, lesbians, transgenders, infidels.  And over here it’s the Democrat Party that wants to let all those people in.  It’s almost an exact role reversal.

Extreme Vetting

trump-illegal-immigration-validatedTRUMP:  I call it extreme vetting. (applause)  In addition to screening out all members of the sympathizers of terrorist groups, we must also screen out any hostile attitudes toward our country or its principles, or who believe that Sharia law should supplant American law.  (applause) Those who do not believe in our constitution or who support bigotry and hatred will not be admitted for immigration into our country.  (applause) To put these new procedures in place, we will have to temporarily suspend immigration from some of the most dangerous and volatile regions of the world (applause) that have a history of exporting terrorism.  Not for us.  Not for us.  (applause and chants)

But in the modern era, we have always vetted people coming into the country. We have always been responsible about it.  The current Regime is not.  And this is all Trump is saying in his foreign policy speech.  And all of these details that you’re learning here are exactly why the media is not spending a lot of time on the details of the speech.  The only thing you’re hearing probably is that Trump once again displayed his lunatic lack of understanding, his unfitness for office or whatever it is, however it is they’re characterizing it.  But substance-wise, you look at the people who heard it and knew what he was talking about, Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump, standing ovation, 13, 15 seconds long.

Donald Trump on Radical Islam

( response to San Bernardino and Orlando bombings)

 

The bottom line is that the only reason the killer was in America in the first place was because we allowed his family to come here.

We have a dysfunctional immigration system, which does not permit us to know who we let into our country, and it does not permit us to protect our citizens properly.

ImmigrationCriminals                I called for a ban after San Bernardino and was met with great scorn and anger . . . but many are saying that I was right to do so. And although the pause is temporary we must find out what is going on . We have to do it.

It will be lifted—this ban—when and as a nation we’re in a position to properly and perfectly screen these people coming into our country. They’re pouring in and we don’t know what we’re doing.

The immigration laws of the United States give the president powers to suspend entry into the country of any class of persons. . . . I will use this power to protect the American people.

Many of the principles of radical Islam are incompatible with Western values and institutions.

We cannot continue to allow thousands upon thousands of people to pour into our country, many of whom have the same thought process as this savage killer. Many of the principles of radical Islam are incompatible with Western values and institutions.

All of the September 11th hijackers were issued visas. Large numbers of Somali refugees i Minnesota have tried to join ISIS. The Boston bombers came here through political asylum. The male shooter in San Bernardino, . . . was the child of immigrants from Pakistan and he brought his wife, the other terrorist, from Saudi Arabia through another one of our easily exploited visa programs.

no-sharia               Immigration from Afghanistan into the United States has increased nearly five-fold, five-fold in just one year. According to Pew Research, 99 percent of the people in Afghanistan support oppressive Shariah law. … They share these oppressive views and values. We want to remain a free and open society. … If we do, then we have to control our borders. We have to control, and we have to control them now, not later. Right now.

The days of deadly ignorance will end, and they will end soon if I’m elected. As president I will give our intelligence community, law enforcement and military the tools they need to prevent terrorist attacks. They don’t have those tools now.

We need an intelligence-gathering system second to none. Second to none. That includes better cooperation between state, local and federal officials, and with our allies, very importantly. I will have an attorney general, a director of national intelligence and a secretary of defense who’ll know how to fight a war on radical Islamic terrorism.

trojan-horse… Clinton’s State Department was in charge of admissions and the admissions process for people applying to enter from overseas. Having learned nothing from these attacks, she now plans to massively increase admissions without a screening plan including a 500 percent increase in Syrian refugees coming in to our country. Tell me, tell me—how stupid is that?

  This could be a better, bigger, more horrible version than the legendary Trojan horse ever was. Altogether, under the Clinton plan, you’d be admitting hundreds of thousands of refugees from the Middle East with no system to vet them, or to prevent the radicalization of the children and their children.

 Not only their children, by the way,—they’re trying to take over our children and convince them how wonderful ISIS is and how wonderful Islam is and we don’t know what’s happening.

What I want is common sense. I want a mainstream immigration that promotes American values.

 

European Leaders: We need Trump Immigration Policy

Dutch leader Geert Wilders at GOP convention backing Trump

 

ISISObama-Sharia-LawWe cannot continue to allow thousands upon thousands of people to pour into our country, many of whom have the same thought process as this savage killer. Many of the principles of radical Islam are incompatible with Western values and institutions. What I want is common sense. I want a mainstream immigration that promotes American values. ~Donald Trump, after San Bernardino and Orlando bombings

“Mr. Trump is a politician, whether the Europeans like him or not, who has one interest, and that is the interest of the American people,” Wilders said in an interview at Quicken Loans Arena.

Europe is notably lacking such leaders, said Wilders, who wears a bullet-proof vest, lives in a safe house and is escorted to his office at The Hague in an armored vehicle each work day.

“We have hundreds of Obamas in the European Union and, in a political way, we have to get rid of them,” he said.

Wilders said Trump is “fighting for his own people, and that is what we are lacking in Europe, when it comes to trade, when it comes to immigration, when it comes to jobs, when it comes to so many issues.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/dutch-leader-geert-wilders-at-gop-convention-backing-trump/#jDWR47e2PuwGC5UT.99

Hungarian Prime Minister Orban says Trump’s Migration, Foreign Policy Plans “Vital” for Hungary

BUDAPEST (Reuters) – Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Tuesday said the migration and foreign policy plans of U.S. Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump were “vital” for Hungary, whereas those of rival Democrat Hillary Clinton were “deadly”.

Orban: Trump’s Migration, Foreign Policy Plans ‘Vital’ for Hungary

Truth Zone: Illegal Immigration, Shariah Law behind mask of Patriotism

Truth Zone:

Illegal Immigration, Shariah Law behind mask of Patriotism

The Real Issue Between Khizr Khan and Donald Trump: Importing Jihad

by Jim Hanson

Con man Kahn

keyOf course, who else would the dems have as their poster “victims” but one of their own in gold star parent clothing? He dishonors his son’s sacrifice with his lies.

wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-150x150Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together

Matthew Boyle

Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.

But until now, it looked like the Khans were just Gold Star parents who the big bad Donald Trump attacked. It turns out, however, in addition to being Gold Star parents, the Khans are financially and legally tied deeply to the industry of Muslim migration–and to the government of Saudi Arabia and to the Clintons themselves.

The government of Saudi Arabia, of course, has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation.

cartoon-Clinton-Foundation“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million,” Schoffstall wrote.

Trump to Clinton: give the money back!

Trump, of course, has called on Hillary Clinton to have the Clinton Foundation return the money.

“Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave vast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays,” Trump wrote in a Facebook post back in June, according to Politico. “Hillary must return all money from such countries!”

“Crooked Hillary says we must call on Saudi Arabia and other countries to stop funding hate,” Trump posted in a separate Facebook posting at the time. “I am calling on her to immediately return the $25 million plus she got from them for the Clinton Foundation!”

Of course, to this day, Hillary Clinton and her Clinton Foundation has kept the money from the Saudi Arabian government.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/clinton-cash-khizr-khans-deep-legal-financial-connections-saudi-arabia-hillarys-clinton-foundation-connect-terror-immigration-email-scandals/

Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Shariah law’