Immigration Facts: Merit-based Immigration System and Immigration Assimilation in the US

Immigration Facts:

Merit-based Immigration System and Immigration Assimilation in the US

Polls Show Huge Public Support for Trump’s Immigration Reforms

Seven Facts About Donald Trump’s Merit-Based Immigration System

Neil Munro

Candidate Donald Trump promised to reform the nation’s cheap-labor immigration strategy, and President Donald Trump unveiled the merit-based immigration reform plan on Wednesday.

Here are seven major features of the new merit-based economic and immigration legislation.

  1. The Senate bill was jointly drafted by two GOP Senators who were elected in the 2014 wave. In that election, Senate Democrats lost ten seats because voters were angry at the Democratic-dominated “Gang of Eight” plan that would have doubled immigration for at least ten years, and shifted more of the nation’s annual income from employees to employers. The two Senators are Georgia CEO David Purdue, and Arkansas veteran and Harvard grad Tom Cotton
  2. The plan would roughly halve the inflow of unskilled labor into the United States, so forcing employers to boost recruitment, training and pay for ordinary Americans. It would halve the inflow of unskilled by canceling the so-called “diversity lottery” which annually hands green cards to 50,000 people picked by lottery, by capping the inflow of refugees at 50,000 per year, and — most importantly — by largely ending the “chain migration” which allows new citizens to bring in their parents, adult children, and siblings, regardless of health, skills or ability to work.
  3. Trump’s plan would allow companies to bring in highly skilled or “ultra-skilled” foreigners — if those foreigners can prove their skills by showing job offers which pay MORE than what is being paid to local Americans. That merit-based process would put an upward ratchet on Americans’ wages, instead of the current process which drags down wages by flooding the labor market with unskilled workers.
  4. Most applicants for immigration and citizenship would be graded on a points system, determined by their age, education credentials, English-language skills, professional awards, investment resources, and job offers. That process likely will allow the immigration of highly skilled foreigners who want to assimilate into Americans’ democratic culture — and who can also develop new technology that makes Americans more productive and wealthy.
  5. Progressives want to hate the reform. It would end their plan to seize national power via the mass immigration of unskilled, government-dependent migrants. That plan has already won them near-complete power in California and Illinois. But without those future migrants, progressives would be forced to seek the votes from actual blue-collar and white-collar Americans, so shifting the focus of national politics back towards a focus on middle-class Americans, and away from the progressives’ media-magnified push for pro-transgender laws, free abortion and weather control.
  6. Business and investors rationally hate the merit-based plan. It would reduce the inflow of cheap labor and of welfare-funded consumers which have helped boost profits and the stock market. Without those migrants, companies will have to raise wages for employees, recruit and train now-sidelined Americans, and invest in American-made, labor-saving machinery, such as robots for farms, restaurants, and slaughterhouses.
  7. Prior polls suggest Trump’s plan will be very popular because it prioritizes Americans over foreigners, employees over employers, wages over profits, and solidarity around the English language over imposed multiculturalism. But the media polls will try to suppress that Trump advantage by portraying the pro-American plan as being mean to weak foreigners, so allowing many elected officials to ignore the public’s real views until around September 2018. That is when the Americans will have the decisive opportunity to vote for or against politicians who support or oppose Trump’s reform. To read more about immigration polls, click here.

Under pre-Trump policies, the federal government annually imports 1 million legal immigrants into the United States, just as 4 million young Americans turn 18.

The federal government also awards roughly 1.5 million temporary work permits to foreigners, grants temporary work visas to roughly 500,000 new contract workers, such as H-1B workers, and also largely ignores the resident population of eight million employed illegal immigrants. That huge extra inflow of wage-cutting workers is to be handled via different legislation and regulation.

The current annual flood of foreign labor spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families.

Click here to read the full text of the legislation. Click here  for a section-by-section summary and click here for a fact sheet on the legislation.

Immigration Assimilation in the US

Rush Limbaugh

Thanks to A.F. Branco at Legal for his great cartoon

THE PRESIDENT: Crucially, green card reforms in the RAISE Act will give American workers a pay raise by reducing unskilled immigration. This legislation will not only restore our competitive edge in the twenty-first century, but it will restore the sacred bonds of trust between America and its citizens. This legislation demonstrates our compassion for struggling American families who deserve an immigration system that puts their needs first and that puts America first. Finally, the reforms in the RAISE Act will help ensure that newcomers to our wonderful country will be assimilated, will succeed, and will achieve the American dream.

RUSH: Whoa! Whoa! Did you hear that? He used the word “assimilated.” You don’t hear that in immigration anymore. “Assimilation? Why, that’s discriminatory! Why should immigrants have to have the American way of life forced on them?” That’s what the left says. That’s right. The American way of life is an imposition, don’t you know? Yes, we have forced — we have imposed — our way of life on people around the world against their wishes.

And we now want to impose our way of life on immigrants. Who the hell do we think we are? That’s their attitude. But assimilation has always been the key to immigration. Again, I want to remind people, immigration, legal immigration in the United States stopped in the mid-1920s and was not resumed until 1965, with the Immigration Act of that year. Do you know why? Because there had been a flood of immigrants in late 1800s throughout the early 1900s, and we had to assimilate them.

Now, it was easy because they wanted to become Americans. They came from all over the world and wanted to be Americans. But it still takes time to assimilate to a new culture, to learn English as your predominant language. We didn’t have any legal immigration for all of those years, mid-twenties to 1965. Every time I tell people that and they don’t know it, they’re shocked.


National Security: Islamic Invasion, Immigration Vetting Process, and Immigration Facts, Part 2

National Security:

Islamic Invasion, Immigration Vetting Process, and Immigration Facts

Islamic Refugees, Rigorous Vetting and the Facts: Part 2

Mark Landsbaum


Remember, the role of the state is to protect the citizens from terrorism by enforcing the law, so that the citizens, including Christians, can have freedom of religion to “welcome the strangerwho has been vetted and is truly in need. First Amendment rights apply to citizens only. Acts of murder, theft, and fraud are not protected by freedom of religion, but are subject to civil law. ~C.D.


Many of our Christian brethren demand more refugees be brought to the U.S., citing as justification the Good Samaritan parable and commandments to love our neighbor and to share the Gospel.

For starters, the Good Samaritan didn’t bring home the victim he found along the roadside. Ever wonder why? He took him someplace where he could be properly cared for.

For the billions of dollars in expenses and welfare benefits refugees cost American taxpayers, refugees could be treated more humanely, yes, even more lovingly, by persuading our Middle East friends to put them up there, where they will be among people who speak the same language, worship the same religion and consequently have more of a chance to obtain gainful employment and return to the lives they once lived.

For every dollar it costs to bring one refugee to America, 12 refugees can be cared for in the Middle East.

Rather than forcibly transplanting these people to America, a land completely foreign in customs, language and faith, wouldn’t it be more kind, let alone more cost-effective, to use diplomatic pressure to persuade or even coerce Middle East nations to shoulder the burden of caring for their own?

As far as loving our neighbors, do our actual neighbors count?

How loving is it to dump tens of thousands of non-English-speaking, almost exclusively Muslim, unemployable people into U.S. neighborhoods where they constitute an immediate underclass, subsisting on welfare and food stamps, resented and viewed suspiciously by the people who already live there, who purposely were never asked if they wanted them living next door?

Ever wonder why communities aren’t asked whether they want large groups of Somalis or Syrians moved in to their neighborhoods? Two guesses.

An obvious concern is whether the refugees are dangerous. Both the FBI and Department of Homeland Security have admitted in recent months that refugees from the Middle East are impossible to vet. We have no idea how risky they may be because there is no reliable way to identify them, let alone to run background checks in a region where governments are reduced to chaos and corruption.

That’s our government admitting these people can’t be vetted.

The over-used cliché of one poison M&M in a bowl of M&Ms has been over-used and become a cliché for good reason. It’s true.

If you were handed a bowl of M&Ms and told that only one of them contained poison, how many M&Ms would you gulp down? Yeah. Me either.

Notice that the people lobbying to bring refugees to America aren’t lobbying to bring them to their houses.

The 9 “volunteer” agencies that accept these refugees then relocate them in U.S. neighborhoods (without consulting existing neighbors) are paid $2,000-plus for each one they process.

And process is all they are permitted to do because even though several of these agencies are connected to religious groups, they are prohibited by law from sharing the Gospel with the refugees because it’s a government program.

Nevertheless, the more refugees they process, the more money the non-profit volunteer agencies make in this billion-dollar refugee placement industry financed, not by private donations, but by tax dollars.

Here’s a quaint reason we must be absolutely certain people we permit to enter our country are eager to assimilate and willing to abandon philosophies and ways of life incompatible with the American constitutional system: If we don’t, we sow the seeds of societal and cultural destruction.

Islam is a political system with a religion attached. Its goal specified in its holy book is to bring the entire world under Sharia law, by persuasion or by force. Don’t take my word for it.

A 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo explains Muslims are engaged in a “Civilization-Jihadist Process.” It states: “The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Those are their words, not mine.

How reasonable is it to expect people with that worldview to assimilate and become loyal to an American way of life they reject as an offense to Allah? Rather than assimilate, Muslims holding to this view demand their religious views be honored by the wider culture. The first step is to extend to Muslims what Bernard Lewis calls a “privileged immunity.” Lewis, author of “The Crisis of Islam,” is an internationally recognized historian on the Middle East.

This “privileged immunity” is manifest in things like blocking traffic with mass prayer, local Sharia courts and no-go zones, where civil law enforcement backs off and concentrated populations of Muslims enjoy “a level of immunity from criticism that Christian majorities have lost and the Jewish minorities never had,” in Lewis’ words.

You might say, “Surely not all Muslims are like that.” If you can figure out how to determine which Muslim refugees do and don’t subscribe to that philosophy among the thousands of un-vettable immigrants brought here, please tell the FBI and DHS. As we saw in Part 1 yesterday, they obviously haven’t been good at detecting the threats from the non-threats before they get here.

While you’re at it, factor in the Muslim deception called “taqiya,” which permits Muslims to lie to advance their faith.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s motto: “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope. Allahu akbar!”

What could go wrong with a religion advanced by a false prophet demanding obedience to a false god when death “in the way of Allah” is the highest hope?

In the United States, members of the Muslim Brotherhood rose to places of authority in the Obama Administration. The U.S.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation for financing the Hamas terrorist group, is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood and prominent in public relations efforts to shape Americans’ views of all things Islamic.

As for our commandment to share the Gospel, whatever happened to taking it to the whole world? I don’t recall Peter or Paul bringing caravans of foreigners to Jerusalem to hear God’s message. They went to where the unbelievers were.

The church has gotten a bit slothful reaching out to the lost. Worse, even when unbelievers are brought to us, we plop them down in instant ghettos where they are least likely to assimilate, let alone to hear the Gospel.

Here’s advice for those with a burning passion to bring refugees to Christ: Go to where they are. Take the Gospel to them. Don’t rely on the government to round them up and pay opportunists $2,000 a pop in tax money to bring them here where they instantly huddle in insulated ghettos, go on welfare and food stamps.

There’s another thing to be aware of in sharing your faith with a Muslim. Ever since their prophet, Muhammad, laid down the law 1,400 years ago, when a male Muslim converts to another faith, “he must be put to death,” historian Lewis points out. For women, “flogging and imprisonment may suffice,” he explains. “For this offense, there is no human forgiveness.”

That brings us back to loving our neighbor. American taxpayers, not all of them Christians by a long shot, are not asked whether they want to finance these festering, impoverished slums like Little Mogadishu in Minnesota.

There was a day in this country when Christians took the Gospel to foreign lands, and if they brought refugees here, they personally sponsored them, helped house them and find them jobs, and took some degree of personal responsibility in their lives – all loving, personal acts.

Today, Christians seem content to hand off that charity work to the government, which spends tax money few taxpayers intended to be spent that way, to achieve outcomes that strain credulity to imagine anyone would have paid for it up front, if they knew that’s what they were going to get.

Finally, safety first. All the debate about costs and assimilation and being good Christians can’t be honestly addressed if we create dangerous cesspools of budding or secretive jihadists, biding their time until they are ready to slit throats or blow up buildings.

The 2015 San Bernardino Muslim terrorists, one born here to an immigrant Pakistani family, the other a Pakistani immigrant on a visa, seemed outwardly to be acclimating to America. Their co-workers threw them a baby shower. But not long after, the duo walked into a Christmas party for co-workers, fired 150 rounds, murdering 14 and wounding 22 others. Neither was on Terrorist Screening Database lists.

President Donald Trump has suggested we should back off importing refugees and other immigrants until we at least know who they are and what their intentions are. That sounds like a pretty basic starting point. How many would you invite into your home based on the existing “rigorous” vetting of your government?

How many jihadist murders in your neighborhood are you willing to accept before you acknowledge this is a dangerous problem? Got a number in mind?  Mine is zero.

National Security: Islamic Invasion, Immigration Vetting Process, and Immigration Facts, Part 1


National Security: Islamic Invasion, Immigration Vetting Process, and Immigration Facts, Part 1

National Security:

Islamic Invasion, Immigration Vetting Process, and Immigration Facts


Hawaii: Muslim Brotherhood-backed imam dictating US refugee policy


Part 1

Mark Landsbaum

Syrian refugees entering Europe

One argument for bringing thousands of Middle East refugees to the U.S. is that these allegedly vetted immigrants are supposedly the safest kind of visitors.

Is that true?

The FBI announced this week it has 300 refugees already in the U.S. under investigation for suspected terror activities. That’s 300 refugees who we were assured were “rigorously” vetted by the United Nations and the U.S. government. Yet, it turns out they are deadly threats.

The 300 constitute 30% of the 1,000 open terror cases being investigated by the FBI. By the way, do you think the FBI has identified all the threats among the refugees? How’s that “rigorous” vetting working for you?

We’re not just talking about people who may commit robberies or muggings or rapes. But terror activities. It’s anyone’s guess how many robberies, muggings and rapes they commit.

Difference between historical refugees and Islamic Refugees since 9-11

It’s also anybody’s guess whether Islamic refugees commit more or fewer routine crimes than any other group. Academic studies usually lump together decades of refugee data, including Cubans from the 1960s, Vietnamese from the 1970s and sometimes even pre-World War II refugees fleeing Europe. How about crimes committed strictly by Islamic refugees since 9-11?

“There is no data that I know of,” Ann Corcoran told me. Ms. Cocoran operates, where for eight years she has monitored refugees imported to U.S. cities.

“…[T]he authorities don’t usually tell the public through which immigration pathway an alien gets in here,” she said by email. “There are many legal programs and only in recent years does a news account call someone who commits a crime a refugee.”

The next time someone tells you that this latest surge of refugees is safe, let alone “the safest” of all immigrants, ask them how they know. Odds are, they are parroting talking points, not reciting documented facts.

Meanwhile, consider some examples of Islamic refugees caught planning or having committed acts of violence that Ms. Corcoran has documented on her website: A Somali arrested as he planned to detonate a bomb in 2010 to blow up a Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Oregon.

There was the Kentucky refugee terrorist now serving a life sentence after lying on U.S. immigration paperwork about his involvement in Iraqi insurgent operations against American troops; two Iraqi refugees were convicted for helping Al Qaeda in Iraq and maybe killing American servicemen there. They also lied on their refugee applications.

(Again, how’s that vetting working out?)

But those are terrorists. Aren’t regular refugees law-abiding?

To get a general idea, we might check out Europe, where there is a direct correlation between high concentrations of refugees and high crime rates. You know, robberies, muggings, rapes, etc.

Apparently unlike the U.S., some European countries specifically track refugee crimes. “Refugees committed more than 200,000 crimes [in 2015] in Germany,” reported the U.K.’s Daily Express.

Refugees in Germany committed 92,000 more offences in 2015 than in 2014, according to official figures. That’s 200,000 crimes that would not have occurred without refugees.

If we ignore all those warning signs, how about this one?

Stealth Jihad Islamic Invasion

“Just wait,” an ISIS Smuggler told BuzzFeed. “It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world and we will have it soon, God willing. They are going like refugees.”

Last year, then-Sen. Jeff Sessions and Sen. Ted Cruz said the problems go beyond the refugee program, and called for closer scrutiny of the pace of immigration from Muslim countries.

“The resources spent every year investigating the countless number of immigrant terrorist suspects in the United States are astronomical,” they said. “And yet, as this costly and dangerous status quo continues, the U.S. continues to admit approximately 680,000 migrants from Muslim countries every five years.”

If the FBI has discovered 300 refugees that slipped through “rigorous” vetting, how many more will be among the next 680,000?

Many of our Christian brethren demand more Middle East refugees be brought to our country, citing as justification the Good Samaritan parable and commandments to love our neighbor and share the Gospel.

In Part 2, we examine Christians’ responsibility and look at the effects on our society and culture from importing refugees who can’t be vetted.

Political Cartoon: President Trump frees Border Patrol

Political Cartoon:

President Trump frees Border Patrol

Thanks to A.F. Branco at Legal Insurrection for another great cartoon

Exclusive: Hungary’s Border Walls Pay for Themselves Through Savings on Illegal Migrants


Election 2016: Voter Education—Democrat Definition; Immigration Facts

Election 2016:

Voter Education—Democrat Definition

history-democrat-votingSpelling Lesson:

The last four letters in American………..I Can

The last four letters in Republican……..I Can

The last four letters in Democrats………Rats

ratsEnd of lesson.   Test to follow on November 6, 2014.

Remember, November 2016 is to be  set aside as rodent removal month.


Photos: Embarrassing Turnout For Hillary Clinton Keynote Speech At Baptist Convention


Voter Education:  Immigration Facts

Jeff Foxworthy












Culture Wars: Parody and Satire vs. Donald Trump, but why not Obama?

Culture Wars:

Parody and Satire vs. Donald Trump, but why no push-back against Obama?

Trump Derangement Reaches New Heights with Boston Globe Parody

Rush Limbaugh

I know a lot of people don’t want Trump nominated.  But I don’t know why! I really don’t know why he has people on our side more hysterical than Obama or Hillary have had them.  That doesn’t make sense to me. ~Rush Limbaugh

I couldn’t agree more, and this isn’t a Trump endorsement either. It doesn’t make sense, all this vitriolic hatred for a man who, with all his faults, is still 1,000 times more patriotic and loves this country more than Obama and the Democrats ever have or ever will. It just doesn’t make sense. ~C.D.


If you need some comic relief, check out this satirical website, The People’s Cube


obama-today-w-Boston-Globe-parodyAt 11 o’clock the gate buzzer rings and I look out there, and it’s FedEx. “Oh, no, what’s this?” It was one box.  So we got the box in.  I looked at the box.  It was from Dorchester, Massachusetts.  I did not recognize the name of the sender.

I opened the box, and inside were two copies of the Sunday editorial section of the Boston Globe dated one year from now.

The front page — which is what everybody has seen now, the fake news of what it would be like with Trump as president one year from now. “Deportations Begin!” “Economy in Tailspin!” “Wall Construction Halted Because of Lack of Funds” or what have you. And then the second page was the full-page editorial from the Globe, anti-Trump.  And this is the second time the Globe was demanding that the GOP stop Trump.  They did it during the Massachusetts primary as well, and Trump ended up winning the Massachusetts primary in a landslide.

And then I thought, “You know what? I have never seen any one of these…” We got all kinds of evidence. Somebody could put together a fake news detailing the current administration’s failures.  I have not seen anybody do a fake news front page or editorial on “Democrats must stop Obama.”  You know, for me it always comes back to that.  What are people really ticked off about on Donald Trump?  When you stop and set this down and just look at this outsized rage, there’s some people who’ve truly become discombobulated in their opposition to Trump.

What is it about?  Caution: This is not a pro-Trump statement.  Don’t anybody misunderstand.  I’m looking at this and I’m trying to understand just what is it that has caused this full-fledged derangement. Not just in the Drive-Bys, but, of course, some on our side, too, have become totally unhinged over this.  And I could go down the list of reasons for dyed-in-the-wool conservatives saying what a big, big threat, Trump is. “He’s not a conservative, would undermine years and years of toil and labor in the basements of think tanks and magazines and whatever else.

immigration-Trump-Carter-Code-1182“Can’t have that!  Can’t have a guy like this, an outsider, get the nomination, when we had nothing to do with it.”  There’s that.  Then there’s also the, “Oh, my God, he doesn’t know what he’s doing! This guy’s dangerous. The country’d be in horrible shape!”  There’s that.  And then he wants to build a wall, he wants to deport, and people are panicking over that.


And yet deportation and a wall are existing American law.  They are United States statutes. There is already a statute requiring a wall to be built, and immigration law clearly defines when and how and whose deportation is to take place.

And so this level of anger and disgust over Trump, I mean, he threatens a lot of things. I understand. He threatens a lot of people.  Some people think that he is a dire threat to the country.  But then I compare any of this to Obama and what we’ve had to live under the last seven years and what it’s gonna be like if we have seven more years of it, and I don’t… Why is there no Obama derangement? 

And I’m talking about good derangement.  Why isn’t there anybody as hell-bent on stopping what the Democrat Party is doing — IS DOING, not “is going to,” is doing? Why isn’t there somebody in the Republican Party, the Republican establishment, the DC elites? Why is there no energy, much less derangement? Why is there no energy whatsoever to stop Obama?  Why is there no energy to stop Hillary?  Why is there no energy to stop the current Democrat agenda and replace it?  So many things here seem out of whack here, to me. 

Again, asterisk: “This is not a pro-Trump statement.”  I’m asking questions. It just all seems out of proportion to me.  Now, somebody has produced an answer for the Boston Globe fake news thing.  Drudge, by the way, posted it on Saturday afternoon, and Drudge had it posted all the way up until, I think, sometime yesterday.

Boston_Globe_Trump_Parody_ObamaLead story, lead headline: “74% of Americans Don’t Recognize Their Country Anymore, Believe We’re on the Wrong Track.” “Islamic Terrorists Rampage Through Boston.” “Race Riots, Looting, Cop Murders in Urban Areas.” “Prolonged Recession Feels Like Depression.”  “IRS Targets Political Opposition.”  “Medical Bills Quadruple.”  “High Taxes, Bad Trade Deals Drive Industries Out of US.”  “President Gives $150 Billion to Our Archenemy, Iran.”  “Obama Blames Climate Change for ISIS.”  All of that’s real! 

It may be a fake news front page, but all of that is real.  Everything! Every headline here is based on actual news that’s taking place.  Now, I don’t mind fevered passion about Trump.  I don’t mind fevered passion about Cruz.  But I’ll tell you, folks, I’m getting a little worried here that there seems to be far more anger and opposition and energy to stop both Trump and Cruz than there is and ever has been to stop Obama.  I’m talking about from people on our side.

We’re dangerously out of proportion here.  And you look at the Boston Globe fake news front page, all about the dangerous of which will happen if Trump.  And the stuff that they are worried about, it’s all based on immigration.  Everything that they headline and parody or warn us about is rooted in immigration and their opposition to it and what they think’s gonna happen to the economy and everything.  It’s obvious.  But it pales… It pales in comparison to what is already happening.  

ObamaWreckingBall2But this parody response by the People’s Cube is right on the money, and you know what it does? When you look at these two things side by side — and you should. You should look at the Trump parody from the Boston Globe and this one.  It plays right into the angle that all of these people so bent out of whack by Trump have been silent for seven years while Obama has transformed the country — and in many people’s estimation, sought to destroy it. 

Not a word.  Not a serious word.  Not a serious effort to stop it.  And compare that to this deranged, unhinged energy to stop Trump.  You have people here who seem a lot more upset by the notion of a Trump nomination than a Hillary presidency. Well, I know a lot of people don’t want Trump nominated.  But I don’t know why! I really don’t know why he has people on our side more hysterical than Obama or Hillary have had them.  That doesn’t make sense to me.  It really, really… That’s why I say so much of this is personal, this opposition.

Truth Zone: Immigration facts, Brussels Attack

Truth Zone:

Immigration facts, Brussels Attack

Trump Predicted Trouble in Brussels


obama-ISISGOPHeadinSandIslamRUSH:  Wait, wait, wait.  Hold it a minute.  That’s a good point.  When’s the last time…? Like when we see the Ayatollah Khamenei, does the Ayatollah Khamenei talk about Islam is a religion and Iran is a nation of peace?

CALLER:  I haven’t heard him say that.

RUSH:  No, the only thing is “Death to America!” “Death to America!” “Death to America!”  You’re right.  The practitioners of the religion don’t even call it a religion of peace.


Cruz on enhanced policing of Muslim neighborhoods

policemanHere’s more Cruz from CBS This Morning, Norah O’Donnell.  “That program in New York, that was disbanded.  They said it didn’t lead to any leads and it didn’t work.”

CRUZ:  It is true that the de Blasio political henchmen say that.  But it’s also true that the NYPD said it provided valuable intelligence.  As I travel the city of New York and as I travel the country, police officers over and over again stop me and they say, “Thank you for standing up and having my back.”  If you look at the attack in Brussels, it’s a direct result of the failed immigration policies in Europe that have allowed vast numbers of radical Islamic terrorists to come to Europe, and they’ve been ghettoized in neighborhoods that have become isolated, that have become separate, and they’ve become incubators for radical Islamic terrorism.

Here’s more Ted Cruz, he’s been charged, “You’re painting one community with one brush.”

CRUZ:  No, I’m not.  There’s a difference between Islam and Islamism.  Islamism commands that you either murder the infidels or you forcibly convert them, you wage jihad.  And here’s the consequence of President Obama and Hillary Clinton and Bill de Blasio refusing to acknowledge what we’re fighting.  You end up with policies that don’t keep us safe.  President Obama and Hillary Clinton both still support bringing tens of thousands of Syrian Muslim refugees to America.  The first obligation of the president as commander-in-chief should be to keep America safe.  I will apologize to nobody for how vigorous I will be as president fighting radical Islamic terrorism, defeating ISIS.


Trump to Work ‘Closely, Directly’ with National Border Patrol Council’ to Set U.S. Border Policy

bordersheriffStephen Miller, the senior policy adviser for the Trump campaign, minced no words in stating that Border Patrol agents will have a “direct line” to the White House if Donald Trump becomes President of the United States. Miller stated, “I am here today to say that we are going to work closely, directly, and intimately with the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) to develop a border policy for this nation.” He continued, “The NBPC will never again have a back seat in our nation’s border policy.”

Austrian Citizens Overwhelmingly Reject EU Migrant Crisis Approach, Majority Would See Borders Closed Indefinitely


Grieving Mom Responds To Kasich’s Amnesty-In-100-Days Pledge: Visit Grave Of My Murdered Child


Laws already in place

Rush Limbaugh

trump-illegal-immigration-validatedListen to this Vin Weber here in this last bite that we played: “I’m scared of Trump as president.  I think he’s an authoritarian figure.  To deport 12 million people…”  Ike deported six.  We’ve done this before.  None of what Trump is proposing is unique.  None of it’s unprecedented.

That’s what’s striking about this.  “To deport 12 million people, build a wall with Mexico…”  Congressman Weber, the wall has been funded.  There’s already legislation to build the wall.  We just haven’t done it because Obama’s not interested.  We’re going to build a wall before Trump ever showed up! The wall is funded via legislation that’s already been passed and signed into law.  “Impose a religious test on people coming into this country is so violative of everything I believe about Amer…”?  We already do and have for who knows how long!

Let me explain again.  This is a former member of Congress.  And look at what they’re reciting as their fears of Trump.  And you know what it all is?  It’s almost by rote. They’re saying things they want Democrats to hear.  They’re saying things that they want certain people to hear so that they will not be thought of as the racists, sexists, and bigots that Trump voters are perceived as.  

So they’re opposed to a wall. They’re opposed to deportation. They’re opposed to religious test.  We’ve had refugees regularly and annually admitted to this country, and every refugee is asked.

Up until Obama, every refugee was asked about his or her religion.  It is the number one reason given by refugees seeking asylum.  They are fleeing religious persecution, they claim, on their application form, or they’re fleeing poverty, or they’re fleeing war, or political persecution. But religious persecution is the number one thing according to stats that refugees list.  By definition, they have to be asked, “What is your religion?”  It has to be confirmed, they claim they’re fleeing religious bigotry and persecution.

border-wallSo they’re asked, “What is your religion? What’s being done to you?” You know, and if they’re coming from the nation of San Cordoba — which doesn’t exist. Mission Impossible made it up, so I’m use San Cordoba. They claim there’s religious persecution in San Cordoba.  Okay, so the authorities have to look and see what’s going in San Cordoba to find out if there is any religious persecution going, or if the guy’s lying.  Congressman Weber ought to know this! We routinely control who the bets into this country.  We always have for the preservation of this country.

Freedom and the Constitution is not a suicide pact, for crying out loud. 

The Eisenhower administration deported six million illegal immigrants back in the fifties, obviously.  It has been done.  Yet all of these things are cited as horrors. “They’re not like any America that I know. It makes me very worried. Trump’s authoritarian figure! He’s gonna build a wall.” It’s already been debated in Congress! It’s already been passed, signed into law.  The money’s there for it.  It just hasn’t been built.  Well, some of it has.  I don’t know, folks.

Truth Zone: Stopping Islamic Immigration Is a Matter of Survival

Truth Zone: Immigration Facts—

Stopping Islamic Immigration Is a Matter of Survival

The easiest way to limit the growth of Islam in the West is to stop Islamic immigration.

EXCLUSIVE – Geert Wilders


Muslims-IslamIn April last year, the renowned nonpartisan Pew Research Center released a report on the future growth of world religions. The content was shocking. The report states that, if current trends continue, Islam will almost equal Christianity by 2050. While the world’s population is expected to rise by 35 per cent until the middle of this century, Islam will grow with a staggering 73 per cent.

Islam is not a religion like Christianity, but rather a totalitarian political ideology.

The consequences of future Islamic growth are frightening. Islam is not a religion like Christianity, but rather a totalitarian political ideology. Its goal is primarily political. Islam wants to make the whole world submit. It aims to establish a worldwide Islamic state and bring everyone, including “infidels,” such as Christians, Jews, atheists, and others, under Sharia law. This is the barbaric Islamic law which deprives non-Muslims of all rights, treats women as inferior beings, condemns apostates and critics of Islam to death, and condones terror. More Islam equals more violence, more intolerance, more terrorism.

culture-wars-Erase-The-CountryWith the growth of Islam, the world will become a less safe place. And so will America. According to Pew, the United States will see its number of Christians decline from more than three-quarters of the population today to two-thirds in 2050, while Islam will more than double in size and replace Judaism as America’s largest non-Christian faith. The consequences of the Islamic presence in America have already been visible in several murderous attacks, such last December’s San Bernardino shooting, but also the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001, and several other acts of terrorism. If Islam doubles in size, the threat of terrorism will only grow.

In the past, the totalitarian ideologies of Nazism and Communism have both been defeated by the common efforts of America and Europe. Without America, Europe would have been lost. But without Europe, America would have been isolated. If Europe had fallen to either Nazism or Communism, there is no doubt that America would have become the next victim. The Transatlantic alliance between Americans and Europeans has been the key to the survival of our common Western civilization. This alliance is in danger today, because the more Islamic Europe becomes, the less reliable it will be as an ally of America.

Syrian refugees entering Europe

Syrian refugees entering Europe

Though the predicted future rise of Islam in the US is worrying, the situation in Europe is far worse. The Pew figures show that Islam has already gained a significant foothold on the European continent and is growing rapidly. Europe’s Islamic population, boosted by higher birth rates and immigration, will nearly double, from 43 million people in 2010 to 71 million people in 2050. In the Netherlands, Muhammad is currently already the second most popular name among newborn boys nationwide and even the most popular name in our three largest cities, Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. This is also the case in the Belgian capital Brussels, the Norwegian capital Oslo, and the British capital London. As a matter of fact even in the whole of Great-Britain, Muhammad has become the most popular name for newborn boys.

The Islamization of Europe will profoundly influence European politics. Winning the Islamic vote will become the goal of ever more European politicians. As a result, Europe’s policies will become even less friendly towards Israel and the United States than they already are. The Atlantic alliance is in danger.

The Islamic vote has already decided at least one major European election: the 2012 French presidential elections. These were won by the Socialist Francois Hollande over the incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy by only 1.1 million votes. Since an estimated 2 million Islamic votes participated, of which 93 per cent – 1.7 million votes – went to Hollande and only 7 per cent to Sarkozy, it was the Islamic vote which gained Francois Hollande the Elysée Palace.

According to Pew, the growth of Islam in Europe is caused by several factors, including the young age of the Islamic population. However, more than half the growth can be attributed to immigration. In other words, stopping all immigration from Islamic countries would reduce the growth of Islam in Europe, but also in America, by more than half. The easiest way to limit the growth of Islam in the West is to stop Islamic immigration.


Culture Wars: Syrian Refugees, Globalist Agenda destroying Germany

Culture Wars: Syrian Refugees, Globalist Agenda destroying Germany

1. Schlafly: Rape jihad shows ‘Germany is no longer German’


Cartoon-Obama-Not-Who-We-AreGlobalists who demand that the West accept a wave of Muslim refugees have obliterated the face of Germany and are threatening to do the same to America, warns conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly.
“This massive immigration is simply changing the face of the world. It’s already changed Germany. Germany isn’t German anymore,” Schlafly told WND. “We want America to continue to be American, with our values, our Constitution’s values. The people who want to make us globalists do not have the best interests of our country at heart.”

Thanks to A.F. Branco at Legal Insurrection for his brilliant cartoon

Schlafly cited recent news of Islamic migrants rape jihad on women in Europe, where government officials are reported collaborating. As WND reported, public outrage is surging over reports of the mass sexual assault of German women in Cologne by Arabs and North Africans during New Year’s celebrations. And reports are coming in of attacks in other German cities, such as Hamburg and Stuttgart.

A leaked police report indicated several suspects in the Cologne sexual assaults claimed to be Syrian refugees. One suspect reportedly told authorities: “I am Syrian. You have to treat me kindly. Mrs. Merkel invited me.”
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has opened the floodgates to migrants with her “open-door” refugee policy, bringing in 1.1 million asylum-seekers in 2015. She plans to bring hundreds of thousands more Muslim migrants into the nation.

syrian-refugees-TWGerman officials have reportedly been told to cover up crimes committed by migrants in order to avoid spreading panic among the population. And no arrests have been made in Cologne. Several German government officials appear anxious to make sure migrants do not receive any of the blame. Facebook, Google and Twitter are working with German authorities to control speech as angry citizens react to the chaos caused by refugees. The deal with social-media giants comes as Germans fume over 100 sexual assaults and robberies perpetrated by migrants last Friday in Cologne.

Merkel gave a speech Dec. 30 warning Germans to shun “those with coldness, or even hate in their hearts, and who claim the right to be called German for themselves alone and seek to marginalize others,” Deutsche Welle reported.

Globalist Agenda

Schlafly told WND, “There are globalists in this world, and they’re not all in the United States. Some of them are in Germany, too. They put achieving globalism above every other value.”
Schlafly cited a book, “Adios America,” in which the conservative author Ann Coulter reveals why immigration is the biggest threat facing the U.S.

“[Coulter] tells how these immigrants come in and then they go after our women,” Schlafly said. “It’s still shocking the way they go after very young women. … These people who are coming in now are going after 10, 11, 12-year-old girls. It’s just so shocking.”
trump-illegal-immigration-validatedThe only way to stop the threat? Schlafly says the U.S. must implement a temporary moratorium on immigration – much like the plan GOP front-runner Donald Trump has advocated.

“We ought to close the border and say we’re going to have a pause in immigration, just like we did during the 1920s,” she said. “We respect our women in America. Other countries don’t. Other countries treat women pretty terribly. I just think we ought to close the border and have a pause, just like Trump believes.”

The conservative firebrand also blasted feminists who remain silent as Muslim refugees sexually assault women.

“They’re not speaking up on behalf of the women who are mistreated,” she said. “It’s very curious. But in any event, it shows that their allegiance is probably more to the Muslims than it is to feminism.”
culture-wars-Erase-The-CountryWND asked Schlafly: Is it too late for Europe to wake up?

“It’s almost too late,” she said. “They get so many of these people who don’t abide by laws – and really don’t even believe in those laws. We want to make sure we don’t let them into this country.”

Schlafly called America “the greatest country in the world” – regardless of what globalists would like its citizens to believe.

“We don’t want to give it up,” she said. “We absolutely do not want to say that we’re just like everybody else. We’re not like everybody else. We’re better than everyone else.”


2. Ted Cruz’s Candid Response When Immigrant Youth Asks If He Would Deport Her

TedCruzTexas Sen. Ted Cruz did not back down from his stance on immigration Wednesday night, after being confronted by a woman who asked if he would deport her, even though it was her parents who brought her to the United States illegally. During an event in Storm Lake, Iowa, Wednesday night, Ofelia Valdez, 30, told Cruz that although she was brought to the country illegally by her parents as a teen, she was able to retain residency due to President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or “DREAM act.” While Valdez’ question invoked many emotions, Cruz did not concede that immigrants should be allowed to stay in the U.S. illegally, noting that deportation is a consequence of a “broken immigration system.” “I would note, if you’re a DACA recipient it means that you were brought here illegally, and violating the laws has consequences,” Cruz told the woman. “And one of the problems with our broken immigration system is that it is creating human tragedies and there are human tragedies when people break the law.” The leading Iowa Republican went on to explain to the woman that, if he were to immigrate to a country illegally, he would most likely be deported — so America should be no different.

“If I illegally emigrate to England or Germany or France or China or Mexico, and they catch me, they will deport me,” he said. “That’s what every other country on Earth does, and there’s no reason that America’s laws should have less respect than the laws of every other country on Earth.” “We should welcome people who come following the laws, but there are consequences for breaking the laws, and that is part of what makes America the nation that we are,” the Texas Republican added.

Truth Zone: History Facts and Immigration Laws

Truth Zone: History Facts and Immigration Laws

Trump’s “Nutty” Proposal Is Already the Law of the Land — and Was Used by Jimmy Carter During the Hostage Crisis

Rush Limbaugh

immigration-Trump-Carter-Code-1182RUSH: Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens.  This law was written in 1952.  It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate, and signed by a Democrat president.

“Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president.  Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Over here, everybody in the establishment in the political class, Republican, Democrat, media, you name it, is all claiming that what Trump said is dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous, unconstitutional, while it is the law of the land.  And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did more.  He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he deported a ton of ’em.