Political Cartoon: Branco Cartoons vs. New York Times’ anti-Semitic Cartoon, Smear Campaign

Political Cartoon:

Branco Cartoons vs. New York Times’ anti-Semitic Cartoon, Smear Campaign

New York Times Runs Blatantly Anti-Semitic Cartoon 2 days before Poway Synagogue Shooting

RUSH LIMBAUGH:

A couple of days before the shooting, the international edition of the New York Times ran a despicable cartoon.  It featured a blind Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke.  Trump is leading Benjamin Netanyahu on a leash.  Netanyahu is portrayed as a dog.  Trump has him on a leash and he’s wearing a Star of David collar.  Just to make sure the point isn’t too subtle.

 

Nazi cartoon in 1940

The Jew leads Winston Churchill. Nazi Germany 1940.

Nazism History

Now, the cartoon could have come right out of any of the rabid anti-Semitic publications from the Nazi Germany days.

Now, the Poway synagogue shooting.  Once again, there has been a shooting by a guy who hates Trump.  The shooter here hates Trump and hates conservatives and calls both of them, us and Trump, vile names.  Yet the Democrats and the media still trying to blame Trump and conservatives for the shooting!  Meanwhile, anti-Semitism has totally taken over the Democrat Party, and do you know how they’re disguising it?  They’re using opposition to Israel as their platform for full-fledged, universal anti-Semitism, including and led by the New York Times.

 

Reason behind New York Times Smear Campaign

Professor Dershowitz said the New York Times owes its readers more than an apology. We are entitled to an investigation and explanation. How did the anti-Semitic cartoon get published? Who approved it? What steps are being taken to prevent a recurrence?

And then he tweeted that the anti-Semitic cartoon published by the New York Times is a symptom of a deeper problem on the left. “It is acceptable to many on the left to employ anti-Semitic tropes as long as they are directed against Israel.” Bingo. Anti-Zionism is becoming an acceptable cover for anti-Semitism. Meaning, you can be an anti-Semite, you can be totally opposed to Jews and just couch it as being opposed to Israel and it sends the same message.

smear-campaignAnd truth is that this kind of smear is not unusual for the New York Times. On Friday they had to apologize for publishing a piece back on Good Friday that claimed Jesus was Palestinian.

The New York Times has people that do not understand the first thing about Christianity. It’s not that they just are biased and are publishing lies. They literally, in this era, in this evolution of the New York Times, they don’t have anybody who actually understands Christianity. Easter worshipers, for example. Easter worshipers.

And the reason is because there is an anti-Christian bias on the left, and once there is an anti-Christian or anti-conservative bias, you don’t have to learn anything about it. It’s just bad. So Fox News is bad, Rush Limbaugh’s bad, talk radio is bad, just because they say it’s bad, just because we’re conservative.

You don’t have to say any more. You don’t have to know any more. You don’t have to explain anything because everybody on your side already agrees, conservatism bad. Christianity bad. Christianity, part of the American founding, the American founding bad. That’s it! That’s the extent of their knowledge. Which, of course, isn’t knowledge.

Breitbart: Report: Suspected CA Synagogue Gunman Called Trump ‘Jew-Loving, Anti-White, Traitorous

 

A.F. Branco Cartoon Corrects NY Times Smear Campaign

Leader of the Pack

 

A Cartoon in response to the New York Times clearly antisemitic illustration depicting Bibi Netanyahu as a dog on a leash being held by President Trump. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.

See more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

Advertisements

Notre Dame Fire: Leftist News Media Smear Campaign vs. Western Civilization, Christendom

Notre Dame Fire:

Leftist News Media Smear Campaign vs. Western Civilization, Christendom

Leftist News Media denies Notre Dame Arson as Possible Cause

Rush Limbaugh

RUSH: So there you have it. Lou Dobbs not backing away from the issue of possible arson, and if it is arson, who could be behind it. You know, 875 Catholic churches in France were vandalized in 2018. I think a lot of people would be surprised that there are even are 875 Catholic churches in France. But there are, and 875 of ’em were vandalized, and there were 12 churches vandalized, including a fire in Paris last month in a single week.

RUSH: So, see? Notre Dame, billions. Three black churches, peanuts. Not fair. Racist Americans. Racist whites around the world eager to rebuild Notre Dame, couldn’t care less about three black churches in Louisiana. That’s CNN’s angle. So you always turn — it’s a good story that so many people are offering so much money to Notre Dame. It’s a very uplifting story.

CNN can’t allow that. Got to tear that down.

CNN Smear Campaign against Notre Dame Donations

There’s a lot of money that’s been donated to Notre Dame and the amount of money in comparison donated to three black churches is much smaller. So all of that’s true. It is the tone. I mean, even juxtaposing these things together, the purpose here is to smear white donors, wealthy white donors, to smear whites as racist and uncaring.

So you take what is a really good story, and you turn it into a negative on the people who are making it a really good story. You impugn the donors.

 They may be able to rebuild Notre Dame, but they’re not gonna be able to put the heart and soul back in. It was built by people who believed in a transcendent world and believed in a searing, was his word, searing love and devotion to Jesus Christ and his mother. And everything that was built into that church came from the heart and the soul of the people who were doing it.

He said, what’s gonna happen here, this little Macron guy, “We’re gonna rebuild it in five years.” So they’re basically gonna get a bunch of Hollywood set designers to get back in there with their computer-aided design programs and try to recreate what it was and get close to the wood and so forth and make it look like it did as much as they can.

Victor Davis Hanson’s point, we simply do not have the heart, the mind-set that we had at the time these great cathedrals were built.

This is a bunch of leftist, stuffed-shirt, arrogant snobs from Harvard and the architectural community saying that Notre Dame was always a fraud, that it was always phony, that there never was this “white Christian France” in the first place, and it doesn’t deserve to be rebuilt as such.  Notre Dame needs to be rebuilt as a secular cathedral.

 

Smear Campaign against Christendom, Western Civilization

Folks, to understand this, it really would be helpful to understand what the overall target is.  It’s not just sufficient to say that “white human history” is being targeted here.  This is the whole concept of Western Civilization — Christendom and all of it — and the actual target is the American founding.  If you can overturn and erase the American founding, then you will have wiped out Western Civilization.  They think they’ve already made great inroads in erasing elements of white and Western Civilization in Europe already.

You see, this effort is worldwide.  It’s not just confined to the United States, but it’s focused here because if the United States’ founding can be erased, overturned, obliterated, or if — better than that — the founding can be reported on and misrepresented so that in a lot of people’s minds, then they will have effectively succeeded in wiping out Western Civilization, which is the objective.

Why?

Freedom.

It really isn’t any more complicated than that.  Freedom.  Freedom is where opposition to liberalism lives.  Can’t have that.

Freedom is the great threat to liberalism. It’s the great threat to totalitarianism, authoritarianism. It’s the great threat to the Democrat Party.  Freedom is where opposition exists, or can.

It has to be wiped out. The roots of it have to be wiped out.  The whole idea that human beings are created in freedom, that freedom is God-given, not man bestowed.

Liberals want to be in charge of who’s free and who isn’t.  They want to erase this idea that there is a God and that God created human beings and in that creation is a yearning to be free.  Gotta wipe that out.  The Soviets did it.  Communism’s basic tenet?

No God, no freedom. The state is it.  When there’s no God and when there’s no faith and when there’s no freedom, there’s no opposition.  But, see, they can’t wipe out freedom because freedom is part of the way we’re created and built.

 

Leftists and the Notre Dame Fire

Abuse of power exposed: Colossal Mainstream Media Trust issue; Obama Administration behind Mueller Probe Smear Campaign Scandal

Abuse of power exposed:

Colossal Mainstream Media Trust issue; Obama Administration behind Mueller Probe Smear Campaign Scandal

Critical Thinking Dinner Topics. This is a must-see video. As you view this discussion between Mark Levin and reliable investigative journalists John Solomon and Sarah Carter, watch for:

  • What message did John Solomon receive from his midnight visitors?
  • When Mr. Solomon said you can tell a good journalist by the soles of his shoes, what did he mean?
  • Why did the Obama administration want to get rid of General Flynn?

 

Clapper: Obama responsible for Russia-collusion Mueller probe

He ‘set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding’

https://www.wnd.com/2019/04/clapper-obama-responsible-for-russian-collusion-probe/

 

April 03, 2019

Michael F. Haverluck

Obama led ‘Trump-Russia collusion’ smear job

Clapper then directed the attention away from himself onto Trump, before trying to shed Obama in a positive light.

If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today … notably, special counsel Mueller’s investigation.”

He then credited Obama for masterminding the probe orchestrated to incriminate Trump.

“President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place,” Clapper continued. “I think it’s an important point when it comes to critiquing President Obama.”

Obama led ‘Trump-Russia collusion’ smear job

https://onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2019/04/03/obama-led-trump-russia-collusion-smear-job/

Political Cartoon: Mainstream Media Bias, Smear Campaign, Fake News

Political Cartoon:

Mainstream Media Bias, Smear Campaign, Fake News

Beat of a Different Drum

Fake news is alive and well in the mainstream media when covering the Covington Catholic kids and Nathan Phillips native American instigator. Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at FlagAnd Cross.com here.

Cultural Marxism vs. Judeo-Christian Culture: Smear Campaign against Catholic Students; War on Men

Culture Wars

Cultural Marxism vs. Judeo-Christian Culture:

Smear Campaign against Catholic Students

Cultural Marxism Part 1

History Timeline: How Cultural Marxism  stole our Judeo-Christian Culture while no one noticed

Tucker: MAGA hat-wearing students smeared by media

Covington Catholic chaperone: Our kids were targeted

 4 Lessons We Can Learn From The Despicable Smear Campaign Against The Covington Catholic Students

Matt Walsh

Daily Wire

It was a weird video, and confusing, and the kind of thing that screams “OUT OF CONTEXT.” But few people wondered about the context or waited to find out what it might be. Instead, a massive dog pile formed, and within hours the boys were being villainized, denounced, doxxed, and threatened with expulsion.

Then more footage emerged. An almost two-hour clip apparently shot by a member of a radical cult called the Black Hebrew Israelites paints a very different picture. It shows members of the BHI screaming taunts and insults at the students. The radicals call the kids “crackers” and “incest children” and “future school shooters.” They shout anti-gay slurs. At one point, someone (presumably a member of the group) tells the kids to “go back to Europe.” Another video shows BHI warning a black student from the school that his white classmates will try to “steal [his] organs.” The young men display remarkable poise in the face of this provocation. Rather than responding in kind, they try to drown out the hate with pep rally-style cheers.

Later, Phillips called the students “beasts,” claimed that they were the aggressors against the black men, and said that he wanted to leave the situation but was prevented from doing so. These are all lies. It seems that Phillips wanted to provoke the students. When he failed, he decided to go with Plan B: defamation.

All in all, I think this whole saga should teach us a few things that any slightly observant person already knew:

1) Your social media hot take can wait for a day or two.

We all seem to be under the impression that the world will stop rotating on its axis if we don’t immediately offer our two cents on every event, the moment it occurs. Many otherwise intelligent people have made fools of themselves (myself included) because they felt the need to voice an opinion on an issue as soon as it came to their attention. But there really isn’t much good that can come of an opinion dashed off and posted to the internet on the fly. Especially when you’re simply adding to a chorus of people who have already expressed that exact point of view. Even if you’re right, your perspective is redundant and useless. If you’re wrong, you’ve just contributed to mass hysteria. So, why not wait? Everyone can survive without your opinion for a few hours while you let the facts come in. There is no downside to taking your time. There is enormous downside to jumping the gun.

2) White teen-aged boys are not evil.

A lot of people had no problem accepting the narrative that was first presented because they really do think — or, more precisely, want to think — that white boys carry on this way routinely. These are mostly the same people who ate up every rumor and accusation against Kavanaugh because they desperately want to believe that privileged white teenagers go around casually gang raping women for sport. These false narratives tell us nothing at all about young white men, but they do tell us something very disturbing about the members of the left-wing pitchfork mob. Namely, that these people hate white men. Hate them. Especially Christian ones. And that’s why some of them, even after finding out the whole story, still justified their reaction on the basis that the sight of a white teenager’s face “causes a visceral reaction.”

3) The media is the enemy of the people.

smear-campaignTrump was right. The news media is the enemy of the people. Certain types of people, anyway. If you happen to be a member of the wrong demographic, the media will eagerly spread lies about you. They will try to destroy your life. They will send the mob to your front door. They will incite threats against your family. They will tear you to pieces. What else can we call them but enemies? This certainly isn’t how friends or allies behave, last I checked.

4) Someone is going to get killed.

On a related note, it’s only a matter of time before a victim of a media-led smear campaign winds up dead. What will the inciters and orchestrators of the outrage mob say then? “We had no idea it would come to this”? Yes, you did. When you put a person’s name and face out there, and you tell the world an outlandishly false story about them, you are lighting a match in a forest full of dry leaves. If somebody finally burns, it’s your fault. I can only hope, when that terrible day comes, that at least a few of the smear merchants will go to jail.

In the meantime, and to hopefully stave off this tragic eventuality, we need some ethical and generous lawyers to come to the defense of the victims, pro bono, and sue the defamers and inciters into oblivion. News outlets that run defamatory and libelous reports about innocent people should face severe financial consequences. Celebrities like Kathy Griffin, who encouraged her fans to retaliate against the high school boys, should be bankrupted by lawsuits. None of this has anything to do with free speech. It’s libel. It’s illegal. And that’s how it should be treated.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/42418/walsh-4-lessons-we-can-learn-despicable-smear-matt-walsh

PJ Media: Lawyer for Covington Catholic HS Families Threatens Lawsuits Against Media Unless They Retract False Stories

Los Angeles-based trial lawyer Robert Barnes offered to represent the Covington families for free should they decide to sue the New York Times. 

 

War on Men

Masculinity Is Not Toxic, but the APA Might Be

Jan 18, 2019 01:00 am
What is toxic is not masculinity, but the imposition of warped views on our sons, our grandsons, our country, and our future.

“Toxic Masculinity? 43% of boys are raised by single mothers. 78% of teachers are female. So, close to 50% of boys have 100% feminine influence at home and 80% feminine influence at school. Toxic masculinity isn’t the problem. The lack of masculinity is.”

Masculinity Is Not Toxic, but the APA Might Be

Jan 18, 2019 01:00 am
What is toxic is not masculinity, but the imposition of warped views on our sons, our grandsons, our country, and our future.

Gillette Commercial 28th Most Disliked YouTube Video of All Time

 

 

Political Cartoon: Justice for All defeats Smear Campaign

Political Cartoon:

Justice for All defeats Smear Campaign

After all the Democrat’s dirty sleazy tricks, obstructing, and anti-due process rhetoric Judge Kavanaugh is now Justice Kavanaugh on the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2018.

See more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

Now that the smoke has cleared, some say the Democrats will pay a heavy price for their sleazy dirty tricks and assault on Justice Kavanaugh. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2018.

More A.F. Branco Cartoons at The Daily Torch

Political Cartoon: Accuser Ford’s False Accusation weaponized Smear Campaign against Justice System

Political Cartoon:

Accuser Ford’s False Accusation weaponized Smear Campaign against Justice System

For behold, they do study at this time that they may destroy the liberty of thy people. ~Alma 8:17

The Democrat party has now weaponized the #MeToo movement devastating equal justice under the law along with the presumption of innocence. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2018.

See more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

…Cotton: Resembles ‘Stalinist Show Trials’…

On Tuesday’s “Hugh Hewitt Show,” Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) argued that some of the statements made by Democratic senators about Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh “resemble the kind of Stalinist show trials you saw in the Soviet Union,” where making an accusation is enough.

Accuser Ford has participated in anti-Trump protests

By Jessica McBride

Updated Sep 17, 2018 at 11:50pm

Re: Christine Ford

Christine Ford participated in a women’s march protesting Trump, a report says.

Christine Blasey Ford, the accuser of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, participated in a women’s march protesting President Donald Trump last year, according to a friend of Blasey Ford’s who spoke to The Mercury News.

The California newspaper quoted Rebecca White, described as “one of Blasey Ford’s neighbors and a good friend.” In the article, White praises Ford’s “honesty and truth” and claims Ford told her about the alleged attack in 2017 without using Kavanaugh’s name. She also revealed a previously unreported detail about Blasey Ford’s politics: That Ford took part in a women’s march protesting President Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh.

The Mercury News, in an article by journalist Julia Prodis Sulek, reported that White told its journalist that “Blasey Ford participated in a local Women’s March protesting Trump last year.” White told the Mercury News she worried that Blasey Ford’s alliance with “liberal causes” will increase tensions when Blasey Ford testifies before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday, September 24, 2018. White indicated to the newspaper that Ford’s political involvement may enable her to speak “authoritatively” before the committee, however.

Trump: ‘Pray for Brett Kavanaugh and His Family!’

2 Men Claim Blasey Ford Mistook Them for Kavanaugh

Avenatti Disaster: Gang Rape Accuser’s Boyfriend Just Blew Her Credibility Apart

New Accuser Got Settlement for Past Sex Claim, Used Ford Attorney’s Firm To Get It

Life in a Gynocracy

Sep 30, 2018 01:00 am
False rape claims are placing us at peril of witch hunts and then, in time, against all who will not bow to leftist rule.

Kavanaugh Letter to Grassley: I Will Not Be Intimidated by Smear Campaign, Character Assassination

Kavanaugh Letter to Grassley:

I Will Not Be Intimidated by Smear Campaign, Character Assassination

Kavanaugh Fights Back!

Defies ‘grotesque and obvious character assassination’

‘Vile threats of violence against my family’

Kavanaugh’s Letter to the Committee: I Will Not Be Intimidated

Rush Limbaugh

Trump is standing by Kavanaugh. In this letter to Grassley and Feinstein, Kavanaugh says, “I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process. The coordinated effort to destroy my good name will not drive me out. The vile threats of violence against my family will not drive me out.” It begins, “Dear Chairman Grassley and Ranking Member Feinstein: When I testified in front of the Senate three weeks ago, I explained my belief that fair process is foundational to justice and to our democracy.

“At that time, I sat before the Senate Judiciary Committee for more than 31 hours and answered questions under oath. I then answered more questions at a confidential session. The following week, I responded to more than 1,200 written questions, more than have been submitted to all previous Supreme Court nominees combined.” Twelve hundred! One-thousand-two-hundred questions! That’s “more than have been submitted to all previous Supreme Court nominees combined.

“Only after that exhaustive process was complete did I learn, through the news media, about a 36-year-old allegation from high school that had been asserted months earlier and withheld from me throughout the hearing process. First, it was an anonymous allegation that I categorically and unequivocally denied. Soon after the accuser was identified. I repeated my denial on the record and made clear that I wished to appear before the committee. I then repeated my denial to committee investigators — under criminal penalties for false statements.

“These are smears, pure and simple. And they debase our public discourse. But they are also a threat to any man or woman who wishes to serve our country. Such grotesque and obvious character assassination — if allowed to succeed — will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions from service.” That’s right, and that’s exactly what the left wants. Make no mistake. The left would be happy if all decent people punted and said, “I want nothing to do with government.” Nothing would make them happier.

Judge Kavanaugh is exactly right about that. He continues, “As I told the committee during my hearing, a federal judge must be independent, not swayed by public or political pressure. That is the kind of judge I will always be. I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process. The coordinated effort to destroy my good name will not drive me out. The vile threats of violence against my family will not drive me out.

“The last-minute character assassination will not succeed. I have devoted my career to serving the public and the cause of justice, and particularly to promoting the equality and dignity of women. Women from every phase of my life have come forward to attest to my character. I am grateful to them. I owe it to them, and to my family, to defend my integrity and my name. I look forward to answering questions from the Senate on Thursday. Sincerely, Brett M. Kavanaugh.”

Where Does the “Right to Be Heard” End?

 

Freedom of Speech does not grant right to be heard

Sep 24, 2018

RUSH: People misconstrue the First Amendment’s right to free speech to also mean right to be heard.

We don’t even know who this accuser is, and Avenatti — at this moment — is demanding to be heard by the Senate Judiciary Committee. And he’s using the personal pronoun “we” demand to be heard.

RUSH: You know, one of my big bugaboos, ladies and gentlemen, is this business of “right to be heard.” People misconstrue the First Amendment’s right to free speech to also mean right to be heard, and we’re hearing it now in the case of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford that she has “a right to be heard.” This is all part of the left trying to stand our system of jurisprudence upside down and on its head.

Well, let me ask this: Once it becomes pretty obvious that a person’s making false claims of attempted rape, at what point do we draw a line and say, “We no longer have to grant this opportunity to be heard and share a story”?

…Every Witness Named by Accusers Sides — with Kavanaugh

…McConnell Blasts ‘Smear Campaign’… Vote in ‘Near Future’

Gallup: Trump Highest Approval in Decade…