Terrorism, Thomas Jefferson, and Barbary Pirates

Terrorism, Thomas Jefferson, and Barbary Pirates

 America’s 200-Year-War with Islam

Gary DeMar

barbaryvsAmericaThe Boston bombings, the Fort Hood shootings, the events of 9/11, and numerous international Islamic terrorist activities are only new to people who have no sense of history.

Most Americans are familiar with the first line of the United States Marine Corps hymn, “From the halls of Montezuma[1] to the shores of Tripoli” but most likely don’t know the source of the “Tripoli” reference. The line “to the shores of Tripoli” refers to the First Barbary War, specifically the Battle of Derna, that took place in 1805.
Our earliest founders were familiar with the terrorist ways of radical Islamists. Thomas Jefferson, who was serving as the ambassador to France, and John Adams, the Ambassador to Britain, met in London with Ambassador Abdrahaman, the Dey of Tripoli’s ambassador to Britain, in an attempt to negotiate a peace treaty. Peace for an Islamist means surrender to Islam.

Peace would come at a price. If America wanted “temporary peace,” a one-year guarantee, it would cost $66,000 plus a 10% commission. “Everlasting peace” was a bargain at $160,000 plus the obligatory commission. This only applied to Tripoli. Other Muslim nations would also have to be paid. The amount came to $1.3 million. But there was no assurance that the treaties would be honored. In vain, Jefferson and Adams tried to argue that America was not at war with Tripoli. In what way had the U.S provoked the Muslims, they asked? Ambassador Abdrahaman went on to explain “the finer points of Islamic jihad” to the Koranically challenged Jefferson and Adams. In a letter to John Jay, Jefferson wrote the following:

“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”[2]

Abdrahaman was paraphrasing the Koran’s “rules of engagement” found in the 47 Surah: “Whenever you encounter the ones who disbelieve [during wartime], seize them by their necks until once you have subdued them, then tie them up as prisoners, either in order to release them later on, or also to ask for ransom, until war lays down her burdens.”
Unless a nation submits to Islam — whether it was the aggressor or not — that nation was by definition at war with Islam. Jihad means “to submit.” A non-aggressing nation is still at war with Islam as long as it hasn’t embraced Islam. Islam’s goal is to conquer the world, either by the submission of one’s will or by Allah’s sword.
Paul Johnson writes:

barbary2“Koranic teaching that the faith or ‘submission’ can be, and in suitable circumstances must be, imposed by force, has never been ignored. On the contrary, the history of Islam from Arabia was followed by the rapid conquest of North Africa, the invasion and virtual conquest of Spain, and a thrust into France that carried the crescent to the gates of Paris. It took half a millennium or reconquest to expel the Moslems from Western Europe. The Crusades, far from being an outrageous prototype of Western imperialism, as is taught in most of our schools, were a mere episode in a struggle that has lasted 1,400 years and were one of the few occasions when Christians took the offensive to regain the “occupied territories” of the Holy Land.”
When President Jefferson refused to increase the tribute demanded by the Islamists, Tripoli declared war on the United States. A United States navy squadron, under Commander Edward Preble, blockaded Tripoli from 1803 to 1805. After rebel soldiers from Tripoli, led by United States Marines, captured the city of Derna, the Pasha of Tripoli signed a treaty promising to exact no more tribute.

President Obama is not the first person who has tried to whitewash Islam’s history and sell us on the peaceful motives of Muslims. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), a Muslim, took his constitutional oath on Jefferson’s copy of the Koran. How ironic given Jefferson’s disdain for Islam’s double dealings.

Jefferson, embroiled in a war with Islamic terrorists in his day, commented, “Too long, for the honor of nations, have those Barbarians been suffered [permitted] to trample on the sacred faith of treaties, on the rights and laws of human nature!”[4] Little has changed since Jefferson’s day.

Teach your family the Key to Survival in a Difficult World


What the Left and Sharia Law have in Common

Rush Limbaugh

You know, minus the terrorism. Let’s look at the similarities. For the kind of Islamists we’re talking about, the Sharia Islamists, there is no authority but Islam. To the left, there is no authority but themselves. They respect and recognize no other authority. They don’t recognize the authority of elections. They don’t recognize the authority of public opinion. They don’t recognize the authority of the Constitution, even though they all swear an oath. Why do you think we require everybody in government to swear an oath to the Constitution?

‘Cause that’s glue, folks. That’s the glue that keeps everything together. The reason all of these oaths of office and oaths of naturalization require pledging fidelity to the Constitution is that that is supposed to be the compact that unites all of us. Winning or losing, we are united as Americans, defined by our Constitution. Swearing the oath announces the understandings based on which we become “we, the people.” If you have a huge movement in the country that’s not just rejecting but actively undermining the Constitution, then it becomes a real question.

And once that group becomes big enough — a majority of the population — then it becomes questionable whether we even have a “we, the people” anymore. And this behavior is very, very close to Sharia Islam. There is no authority but Islam. It’s a core tenet: The ruler must be obeyed as long as he complies and enforces Sharia. And if the rural abandons Sharia, they assassinate him like in the case of Anwar Sadat or Mubarak. Now, they don’t do assassinations here, but if the left’s leader abandons them, you know what happens to them.

They’re immediately forgotten, destroyed, cast aside, and ruined. But here, let me try it a different way. If Islamists are in the role of Democrats in my analogy, Americans assume the role of the GOP. We proclaim that our commitment to tolerance means that we have to make room at the table even for Islamists and people we disagree with. Notwithstanding that they deny our right to govern ourselves under our own principles. In other words, you’ve heard people say, “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.”

RUSH: My point is to the left, the Democrat Party, the media — however you want to describe ’em — everything but what they believe and everything but who they believe is illegitimate. There is no crossing the aisle. There is no compromise. There is no working together to prove Washington or government works. There is only one way. When they are in power, they pretend it’s because their beliefs are a popular mandate. But that is disproven every time they lose. Their views cannot be the result of a popular mandate; otherwise, they would never lose elections. When they lose elections — when they’re not in power — their beliefs dictate that everything else must be delegitimized, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing today. Everything about this Russian collusion and everything about Susan Rice and all of these investigations and the leaking, it’s all about delegitimizing the duly elected, constitutionally legal president and Congress. It’s about delegitimizing that. It’s not about working with them. It’s not about them having a head case and not understanding yet that they lost. It’s not about that they’re gonna come to their senses down the road.

There is always a pretense that they represent the popular mandate, when they very rarely really do.

Teach your family the Key to Survival in a Difficult World




History Heroes: How did the Greatest Generation conquer 20th Century Terrorism?

History Heroes:

Terrorism Facts Part 2

greatest-generation4-much-owed-fewHow did the Greatest Generation conquer 20th Century Terrorism?

In Part 1 of this article we learned a reason for the inexplicable behavior of many people in our society—that is, going over to the dark side, to join with or defend Islamic terrorism. This state of mind and emotion in which we are vulnerable to being converted “at the point of a sword” is called the Stockholm Syndrome. Islamic terrorism has been around for centuries, had connections with Nazism in the 20th century, and exists as Islamo-fascism today. Here, in Part 2, we learn how the Greatest Generation conquered terrorism. We can benefit by learning lessons from great history heroes.

Terrorism Facts, Part 1: How does a Society first abhor, then embrace Terrorism?


Of Terror and Courage, Part 2:

What would the ‘Greatest Generation’ Do?

keyThese are the kinds of measures the WWII generation would have implemented, at least for starters. Call it tough love on a national scale. But that in turn requires two things in short supply today: courage and moral clarity. ~David Kupelian


IS THERE A CURE FOR THIS TERRIBLE SYNDROME? Yes, and since Americans have a history of vanquishing tyrants, let’s explore the powerful lessons they’ve bequeathed to us.

First, let’s look at how the “Greatest Generation” managed to vanquish major evil “isms” like Nazism and Japanese imperialism.

Judeo-Christian Values

greatest-generation1To understand how the WWII generation was able to deal so effectively with monstrous totalitarian movements, it’s essential to realize the fundamental difference between America then and now. For all our problems back then, America had tremendous national unity and a strong sense of identity. Judeo-Christian values were still paramount at work, play and everyday life—they comprised the cultural “air” we all breathed. We weren’t yet crippled by national guilt, self-doubt and self-hatred like we are today. There’s no way we could have been bamboozled into thinking same-sex marriage is perfectly normal, or that slaughtering innocent babies in the womb is moral and constitutional, or that posting the Ten Commandments on a courthouse wall somehow violates the First Amendment.


greatest-generation3-vs-entitledIn other words, we were not corrupted with the anti-biblical philosophies and utter confusion that have suffocated our modern era and robbed it of genuine moral strength. Back then, the unified national character and confidence of the “Greatest Generation” allowed us to make the tough decisions that were necessary to preserve our nation, rescue our allies, and end a terrible war.

Perhaps the most controversial action in U.S. military history was dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to break the will of the maniacal Japanese war effort. Decades later, arguments still abound both for and against this use of the A-bomb.

But whatever you may think in retrospect about the destruction of those two Japanese cities, what is undeniable is that doing so accomplished more than end the war with Japan. It broke Japan. It confronted the “evil spirit” that had possessed that nation—a totalitarian, emperor-worshipping military cult obsessed with expansion—and violently exorcized it.

greatest-generation2-ww2Having neutralized the evil that had captivated Japan, America became that nation’s friend and helped massively reconstruct it, ultimately turning Japan into the civilized, successful, First World economic power it is today. Think how utterly amazing that is.

For that matter, after the Allies annihilated Hitler’s war machine and along with it the german capacity and will to conquer its neighbors, the U.S. also helped a newly sober Germany become a great Western power. Our enemies, Japan and Germany, became our friends.

No, I’m not saying “Nuke Mecca.” I am simply affirming what Arial Sharon said years ago: We must create in the enemy “a psychology of defeat, to beat them every time and to beat them so decisively that they would develop the conviction they could never win.

appeasement-quoteRemember, moral weakness—appeasement—whether in individuals or nation states, always encourages violence.

Just as with communists and Nazis, today’s Islamo-fascists regard goodwill gestures and concessions as contemptible weakness and an irresistible invitation to take advantage. Hitler, shortly after the appeasing Neville Chamberlain arrived home proudly displaying his worthless peace treaty, turned around and attacked Britain.

So, what would the U.S. Congress of the WWII era do today about frequent threats by radical Islamists to commit further terror on the U.S. homeland?

The “Greatest Generation’s” lawmakers would probably—after making a brief apology to all law-abiding Muslims living here—announce immediate and severe restrictions on immigration into the U.S. from Muslim countries. No more Muslim chaplains in our prisons to act as recruiters.

no-shariaNo more Saudi-funded, anti-American Islamic schools here. If a mosque in the U.S. is proven to have been used for storing terror weapons and fomenting revolution, it gets bulldozed—immediately. You get the idea. We’re at war. These are the kinds of measures the WWII generation would have implemented, at least for starters.

Call it tough love on a national scale. But that in turn requires two things in short supply today: courage and moral clarity.


Terrorism Facts, Part 3: Courage and Moral Clarity

Terrorism Facts, Part 1: How does a Society first abhor, then embrace Terrorism?


Truth Zone: Illegal Immigration, Shariah Law behind mask of Patriotism

Truth Zone:

Illegal Immigration, Shariah Law behind mask of Patriotism

The Real Issue Between Khizr Khan and Donald Trump: Importing Jihad

by Jim Hanson

Con man Kahn

keyOf course, who else would the dems have as their poster “victims” but one of their own in gold star parent clothing? He dishonors his son’s sacrifice with his lies.

wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-150x150Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together

Matthew Boyle

Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.

But until now, it looked like the Khans were just Gold Star parents who the big bad Donald Trump attacked. It turns out, however, in addition to being Gold Star parents, the Khans are financially and legally tied deeply to the industry of Muslim migration–and to the government of Saudi Arabia and to the Clintons themselves.

The government of Saudi Arabia, of course, has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation.

cartoon-Clinton-Foundation“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million,” Schoffstall wrote.

Trump to Clinton: give the money back!

Trump, of course, has called on Hillary Clinton to have the Clinton Foundation return the money.

“Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave vast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays,” Trump wrote in a Facebook post back in June, according to Politico. “Hillary must return all money from such countries!”

“Crooked Hillary says we must call on Saudi Arabia and other countries to stop funding hate,” Trump posted in a separate Facebook posting at the time. “I am calling on her to immediately return the $25 million plus she got from them for the Clinton Foundation!”

Of course, to this day, Hillary Clinton and her Clinton Foundation has kept the money from the Saudi Arabian government.



Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Shariah law’


Christian News: Voter Guide; Pope Francis defends Abortion?

Christian News:

Christian Voter Guide

afaactionvoter-guideAFA Action releases 2016 voter guide

March 2016 – Many Christians want to vote but aren’t sure who to vote for. It’s difficult to sift through the vast amounts of information coming through television, radio, and Internet.

In fact, one study revealed that only 10% of voters feel they have enough information on candidates to be an informed voter in primary or general elections.

Now AFA Action (afaaction.net) can help with its 2016 Voter Guide.

The guide provides an in-depth, web-based, and nonpartisan perspective on the candidates. It allows voters to identify where the candidates fall on a scale from “very liberal” to “very conservative” and everywhere in between.

The voter guide looks at the history of each candidate so voters can see for themselves how candidates have voted in the past; to whom the candidates have given money; from whom the candidates received money; how the candidates answered questions on critical issues; and who endorsed each candidate.

“Changing presidential candidate poll numbers indicate that many voters are uncertain about who they’ll vote for,” said Randy Sharp, AFA director of special projects. “Our voter guide provides them with reliable and factual content so they can be informed and not misled by slickly-produced campaign ads that often hide the truth.”

In addition, AFA Action provides voters with critical tools, such as instant access to contacting elected officials, voter registration helps, apps, and a pledge that supporters can sign to continue receiving updates from AFA Action.

“We encourage our supporters to share the voter guide with friends and family,” Sharp said. “They can also follow us on Facebook at AFA Action or Twitter at @AFAAction.”

Pope Francis defends Abortion?

Has the Pope Fallen Off the Pro-Life Wagon?

Alan Keyes

abortion5-jesus-pro-lifeLittle children it is the last hour: just as you have heard, Antichrist is come, and even now many Antichrists have come to be, by which we know that it is the last hour. 1 John 2:18

Thus sinning against your brothers, and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. 1 Corinthians 8:10

Since Christ made it clear (Matthew 24:36) that even he does not know the day and hour when heaven and earth will pass away, I have never wasted much time on people who think they have figured it out. Yet Christ also made it plain to his disciples that they should always be on guard, so “that day will not come upon you suddenly like a trap.” It seems best to heed the familiar motto and “Be Prepared”.

Be that as it may, every now and then something happens that sorely tries my determination to forego the search for certainty about eschatological things. I experienced such a moment this weekend, as I read a story with the headline “Pope calls Italy’s foremost abortion promoter one of nation’s ‘forgotten greats’.” As I read the story I couldn’t repress a rueful sigh. Sometimes it seems as if Pope Francis is determined to purge all humor from the phrase “more Catholic than the Pope.” Will we see the day when any Christian person who refuses to praise those who practice or lure others into practicing the wicked slaughter of innocents (I think they qualify as what the Bible calls “workers of iniquity.”) will fit that description?

What a falling off is there! From one supposed to be the Vicar of Christ, comes praise of one who represents those whom God hates (Psalm 5:5). Emma Bonino has been called the Margaret Sanger of Italy.

Young people positive on everything but …

AFA-millennialMarch 2016 – The Millennial generation (born 1980 or later) has a more positive view than any other generation on every societal institution except church and religious organizations. Compared to older generations, Millennials have a more favorable opinion on the positive effects of small and large businesses, financial institutions, labor unions, the energy industry, national news media, colleges and universities, and the entertainment industry. Millennials’ rating of most types of institutions has grown more favorable in the time between the last poll on the subject in 2010 and Pew Research’s most current poll in 2015.

Only two institutions received a more negative rating by Millennials in 2015 than in 2010 – the news media (still regarded more favorably than by other generations), and the church and religious organizations. In 2010, 73% of Millennials said churches and religious institutions have a positive effect on the way things are going in America. Now, only 55% of Millennials agree with that statement. The change means Millennials have gone from polling with an opinion of the church eight points higher than any other generation to polling six points lower than any other.

gospelcoalition.org, 1/5/16; pewresearch.org, 1/4/16; onenewsnow.org, 1/6/16

Tune in to your teens with listening ear

teenagerSonAndMomMarch 2016 – “When your teenagers are talking about their concerns, stop what you’re doing and listen,” said parenting expert Mark Gregston. “When you pay attention with your eyes … it shows you care about them.”

Gregston, founder of Heartlight Ministries, also suggested that moms and dads ask follow-up questions, letting teens know their words are being heard.

Heartlight (heartlightministries.org) began in 1988 when Gregston and his wife Jan began building a place of hope for parents and restoration for struggling teens. Today, the ministry’s East Texas campus offers a residency program with a rigorous spiritual component to help teens integrate Christian faith into all aspects of life.

Mark Gregston’s radio commentary, 1/1/16

Parenting Today’s Teens by Mark Gregston is a 30-minute weekly radio program heard on more than 1,500 stations, including Saturday evenings on American Family Radio.

Fewer clients, more funding for Planned Parenthood

AFA-Planned-Parenthood-chartMarch 2016 – The 2014-2015 annual report from Planned Parenthood reveals that, while the abortion industry giant received a $25 million increase in federal funding, it saw nearly one million fewer clients come through its doors.

In the 2013-2014 report, Planned Parenthood recorded $528.4 million in government health services grants and reimbursements and 2.7 million patients. In 2014-15, those numbers changed to $553.7 million and 1.5 million patients. The total number of services Planned Parenthood reported for 2014-15 was 9,455,582 – of which 324,000 were abortions – and in the year before, 10,590,433 total services with 327,000 abortions. Of Planned Parenthood’s total revenue of $1.297 billion for 2014-15, $309.2 million came from its non-government funded health services.

onenewsnow.com, 1/7/16

Terrorism concern highest since 9/11

AFA-islam-concernMarch 2016 – Political correctness and media bias continue to disallow any connection, but the American public continues to see the parallel between terrorist attacks and radical Islam. For the first time since 2006, Americans worry about terrorism more than the economy. A CBS News poll in December 2015 found that 14% of voters say terrorism is their top concern, compared to 12% who say the economy.

In addition, 44%, the highest percentage since 9/11, fear another terrorist attack. That fear has been heightened since the November massacre, when a woman (who publicly pledged to the Islamic State) and her husband murdered 14 and injured 21 others in San Bernardino, California.

onenewsnow.com, 12/13/15; nationalreview.com, 12/10/15; Chart source: yougov.com, 12/5-7/15

CDC: gay lifestyle more violent

March 2016 – In the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey measuring violence according to sexual orientation, Centers for Disease Control found that those in homosexual and bisexual relationships experience more violence from their partners than do heterosexuals. While 26% of homosexual men and 37% of bisexual men experience rape, physical violence, or stalking, women experience even more violence in same sex relationships. Forty-four percent of lesbians and 61% of bisexual women encounter sexual violence.

In comparison, 16% of heterosexual women have felt endangered or threatened by stalking, 9% experience rape, and 35% experience at least one of the three types of sexual assault from a male partner.

onenewsnow.com, 12/13/15

Global responses to persecution vary

AFA-christian-persecutionMarch 2016 – At the December conference “Under Caesar’s Sword” in Rome, Italy, researchers from University of Notre Dame and Georgetown University examined how Christians respond to persecution in countries around the globe. Estimates indicate that 80% of instances of religious persecution are carried out against Christians, but Christian responses vary depending on the form of persecution.

In places such as Syria and Nigeria, where Christians are openly attacked, they are more likely to flee, whereas they may try to live quietly and cope under unfriendly state governments in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, or Afghanistan.

While there have been instances of terrorized Christians taking up arms in self-defense in places such as Nigeria, researchers note that these examples have been remarkably few. Far more often, Christians do not retaliate with violence.

“In 2013, dozens of Christian churches were burned down, and the response was to paint on their crumbling walls: ‘Love your enemy,’” said Egyptian Coptic Christian Bishop Anba Angaelos.

In Western Europe and countries such as the U.S. and Indonesia, where persecution is largely faced in attempts to exclude Christian faith from the public arena, Christians actively seek to advocate for themselves by addressing social, cultural, and political issues.

cruxnow.com, 12/11/15; christianitytoday.com, 12/14/15

Truth Zone: God vs. Terrorism| Bill Clinton’s Abuse of Women

Truth Zone:

God vs. Terrorism

BREAKING: Another Hamas Terror Tunnel Collapses. God Delivers His Third Plague.

hamas-tunnel-terrorismOn Monday, The Daily Wire reported that Palestinians celebrating the martyrdom of Hamas members at a funeral procession fell onto a crowd of mourners after the roof they were standing on spontaneously collapsed. The mourners were gathered to lament the loss of terrorists who were, coincidentally, buried alive in a secret tunnel they constructed in order to attack Israel. Both the tunnel collapse and the subsequent roof collapse were seemingly miraculous.

On Tuesday, God struck once again, collapsing another Hamas terror tunnel. Three terrorists died in the rubble.

Hamas has been attempting to launch a terror attack on Israeli soil through tunnels for several years. Like the tunnels underneath the American southwest border with Mexico, these tunnels are used to smuggle arms and weaponry into Israel. The American border with Mexico, however, is also used to smuggle drugs. Palestinian terrorists, however, are less concerned with financial gain and earthly pleasure. They’re in the business of butchering innocent Israelis to achieve glory in eternal Islamic paradise.

The tunnel-crawling, genocidal Hamas terrorists were quite possibly eager to die for their cause. As the civilized world watched, God answered their prayers. Where they’re going after death is anybody’s guess. 


Hamas Tried To Dig Another Terror Tunnel. Then God Stepped In.

Michael Qazvini

God Caved A Tunnel In On Hamas Terrorists. What He Did Next, At Their Funerals, Is Even More Amazing.

Michael Qazvini

Generals fear Benghazi 2 in Libya


ObamaHillaryLyingtoAmericaWhistleBlowerObama’s 2011 Libyan military adventure is the gift that keeps on giving: Weapons flooding into Syria, the rise of ISIS, thousands of refugees fleeing across the Mediterranean weekly into Italy, chaos in Tripoli, four dead Americans in Benghazi.

Now he wants to to do it all again.

Can these outspoken generals keep Obama from committing another “trillion-dollar failure”?


Bill Clinton’s Abuse of Women

Do we want this pervert’s wife (and his accomplice) in the White House?

Fight the Clintons- help Kathleen Willey save her home!

clinton2-bill-pervertKathleen Willey, an active Virginia Democrat, served as a volunteer in the Clinton White House Social Office. In 1993 she was [r-rated] assaulted by President Bill Clinton in the Oval Office where she went to ask for a job.

It was horrifying. He overpowered her and [R-rated] If not for an impending meeting for which the president was late, she might not have escaped his grasp.

On that same day, Kathleen’s husband, overcome with financial grief, walked into the woods in a rural Virginia county and took his own life.

But it was when Willey was subpoenaed as a witness to be deposed in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case against Bill Clinton, that Kathleen’s horrendous problems began. Willey was subjected to a veritable terror campaign to scare her into silence.

clinton1-mafiaAs Willey relates in her book, Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton, “they subjected me to a brutal campaign of fear and intimidation,” trying to silence her. Her children were threatened by heavy handed “detectives” hired by Hillary. These goons threatened her friends’ children. They took one of her cats and killed another. They left a skull on her porch. They told her she was in danger. They followed her. They vandalized her car and slashed her tires. They tried to kidnap her dogs. In fact, they treated her like every other woman — assaulted by Bill Clinton, with bullying and strong-armed tactics.

But this brave woman had the courage to speak out and point out Hillary’s role as an accessory in Bill’s —crimes: a string of assaults and rapes against women. In fact, Kathleen Willey vowed to travel the country this year to speak out about the stunning truth about Hillary Clinton

Kathleen has been an important voice in exposing Hillary Clinton’s abuse of the women who got in the way of the Clintons’ political agenda or their grab for power and wealth. Along with Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones these women must be heard by younger women thinking of voting for Hillary

truth2momentAlthough they did not carry out their physical threats against Kathleen Willey, they have tried to discredit her and destroy her personally and financially. When Kathleen wrote the first draft book about her experience with Bill and Hillary her home was burglarized and the book was stolen. Prospective employers have been pressured. The Clintons want to destroy this brave woman.

With her husband having taken his own life, Kathleen Willey has since had to struggle to handle his debts and now faces the foreclosure of her home outside of Richmond. At the same time, she has kept a heavy schedule of newspaper and radio interviews, speaking the truth about the Clintons and exploding the myth that Hilary is an advocate for women.

That is why I need your help today.

In 19 short days she will be evicted. Kathleen will lose the place where she has lived with her pets for 20 years.

You and I cannot let that happen. Kathleen Willey has an important role to play in the 2016 election. It’s shameful that Bill and Hillary are worth over $250 million while Kathleen has fallen behind in her mortgage.

Working with other women, we have established the A CPA in California administers the fund. This is NOT a political action effort; this is a sincere effort by supportive women to save Kathleen’s home.

Every dime other than the cost of this solicitation will go to save Kathleen Willey’s home. There will be no over-head, no lawyers’ fees and no administrative fees. A full audit of the fund will be published on-line when we pay off the mortgage and close the fund.

Kathleen Willey has shown enormous courage in speaking out against the Clintons. The Clintons have tried to crush her. Now, in her time of need she needs our help.

You can go HERE to make your donation.

When the KATHLEEN WILLEY MORTGAGE PAY- OFF TRUST FUND pays down the mortgage, the fund will go out of business. 100 % of what you donate, except the cost of this solicitation, will go to funding Ms. Willey’s Mortgage.


Pamela Jensen, C.P.A.

Terrorism Facts, Part 1: How does a Society first abhor, then embrace Terrorism?

Terrorism Facts, Part 1: How does a Society first abhor, then embrace Terrorism?

Why Are So Many in Our Society Going Over to the Dark Side?

appeasement-quoteWe need to recognize that people have been conditioned for years in the public school system by multi-culturalism and political correctness. Consequently, we are seeing those products of our education system promote suicidal appeasement as a matter of policy.

You’ve heard of people volunteering to be the “devil’s advocate,” no doubt thinking themselves clever in doing so. Well, this is no longer a mere intellectual maneuver. What of the growing numbers of people who are being drawn to, even converted to, radical Islam?

obama-hypocrisyI have been asking myself how some in our society seem to accept and even justify the barbaric behavior of Islamic terrorism. Here, in these excerpts adapted from David Kupelian’s insightful book, How Evil Works, we can begin to understand what is happening. And it is my prayerful desire that we can heed this warning so that we not only do not fall prey to this hideous evil, but stand strong against it, and prevail. ~C.D.

P.S. This doesn’t explain why people defend the documented evil barbarism of Planned Parenthood, but I suggest a reason for that in my January newsletter.


keyoldBehold, thou art not only guilty of priestcraft, but hast endeavored to enforce it by the sword; and were priestcraft to be enforced among this people it would prove their entire destruction. ~Alma 1:12

Of Terror and Courage

How Western liberals have fallen prey to the ultimate Stockholm syndrome

David Kupelian

keyThe ultimate goal of terrorism is to capture our hearts and minds—to convert as many of us as possible. For centuries militant Muslims have converted “infidels” to their religion by threat of death (just as Islam’s legal system, Sharia, to this day prescribes death as the penalty for leaving Islam). This forced conversion and retention process—so alien and repugnant to us in the West where religious liberty is enshrined—really does work, and not just on individuals, but on entire societies. The problem is, extreme emotion like this throws our minds into “program mode,” so to speak. That’s the state of mind and emotion in which we are vulnerable to being converted “at the point of a sword.”


Part 1

Sympathy for the devil

iran-humiliation-sailorsON ONE LEVEL, TERRORISM WORKS BY SIMPLY CAUSING US SO MUCH PAIN, suffering, emotional turmoil and fear of future attacks that we give in to the terrorists’ demands. This much we all understand.

But the ultimate goal of terrorism is to capture our hearts and minds—to convert as many of us as possible.

What? How can terrorizing us transform our attitudes in favor of the terrorists’ viewpoint? Wouldn’t we recoil in horror and, if anything, move farther away from empathy for the perpetrators? Not necessarily.

Remember, for centuries militant Muslims have converted “infidels” to their religion by threat of death (just as Islam’s legal system, Sharia, to this day prescribes death as the penalty for leaving Islam). This forced conversion and retention process—so alien and repugnant to us in the West where religious liberty is enshrined—really does work, and not just on individuals, but on entire societies.

ISIS-Genocide-in-Iraq-AP-Photo-640x480Stop and consider what happens when we’re powerfully intimidated and frightened by anything, including terrorism. Wonder of wonders, some of us start to side with the intimidator/terrorist. Of course, part of this is the survival instinct of siding with our enemy so he won’t hurt us. But there’s much more to it: When we’re confronted with serious intimidation, most of us become very upset emotionally, angry, fearful, confused.

The problem is, extreme emotion like this throws our minds into “program mode,” so to speak. That’s the state of mind and emotion in which we are vulnerable to being converted “at the point of a sword.”

Stockholm Syndrome

Let’s take a quick trip back in time to 1973. On August 23 of that year, at 10:15 a.m., a submachine-gun-toting escaped convict named Jan-Erik Olsson attempted to rob a bank in Stockholm, Sweden, and in the process took four hostages.

During their five-and-a-half day captivity, the hostages—three women and one man—were locked in a bank vault, threatened repeatedly at gunpoint, strapped with dynamite, and had nooses attached to their necks so they’d be strangled to death if police attempted to rescue them by means of a gas attack.

Yet, incredibly, while they were thus held captive, the hostages developed a strong and lasting emotional bond with Olsson and another ex-con who had joined him. They came to sympathize with and support the criminals holding them hostage and threatening their lives, while fearing and disparaging the police who were risking their own lives trying to save them! In fact, some of the captives later testified in court on behalf of their captors, refusing to give evidence against them—and even raised money for their tormentors’ legal defense.

A woman who identified herself as Nayet, wearing a burqa, leaves the police station after her release in ParisThis phenomenon of actives bonding emotionally and siding with their captors, dubbed the “Stockholm syndrome” after the bank hostage case, has been observed in similar hostage situations over the years, and has aloes shed light on other seemingly inexplicable behaviors.

Indeed, as clinical psychologist Joseph M. Carver points out, “law enforcement personnel have long recognized this syndrome, with battered women who fail to press charges, bail their battering husband/boyfriend out of jail, and even physically attack police officers when they arrive to rescue them from a violent assault.”

All those unfortunate enough to be caught up in a powerfully intimidating relationship—hostages, abused women or children, cult members, prisoners of war, concentration camp inmates, victims of incest—are considered vulnerable to the Stockholm Syndrome, whose clinical characteristics include the following:

  1. The captives start to identify with their captors, at first as a means of survival, calculating that the captor won’t hurt them if they are cooperative and supportive.
  2. The captives realize a rescue attempt is dangerous and could result in their being hurt or even killed, and so they come to fear and oppose efforts to rescue them.
  3. Longer-term captivity (here’s where it gets really weird) fosters an emotional attachment to the captor, as the victims learn of the captor’s problems and grievances, as well as his hopes and aspirations. In some cases, the captives come to identify with and believe in the justness of the captor’s “cause,” effectively joining his side.



syrian-refugees-TWHere’s a key principle of how evil works: Hate can easily morph into “love.” Not real love, of course, but rather an emotional identification and bonding many of us mistakenly think of as love.

This is the operative mechanism of the Stockholm syndrome: It isn’t just being close to hostage takers and learning about their problems and aspirations that causes conversion to their viewpoint. What causes the “mind meld” to occur is the intense emotion—the terror the hostages feel when their very lives are being threatened, and the rage that underlies the fear.

That emotional climate has a way of wiping their mind’s hard drive clean and allowing for new programming. This is brainwashing at its most elemental level.

MuslimWarriorEurope is already well in the syndrome’s grip. Although Britain has exploded with more extremist Islamist activity and active terror cells than almost anywhere else in the Western world, most Brits express a chipper view of the Muslims in their midst, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center. Almost two out of three Britons—63 percent—claim a favorable opinion of Muslims.

But this love is unrequited. The level of raw hatred British Muslims have for non-Muslim Brits is higher than anywhere on the continent.

And the “most comprehensive survey ever undertaken of Muslim student opinion in the UK” showed an astonishing “60 percent of active members of campus Islamic societies said killing in the name of religion can be justified.”

Is it just possible that the extreme “tolerance” Brits display toward the militant jihadists in their midst is nothing more than weakness—a timid, smiling attempt to pacify the bully in the vain hope he won’t hurt them anymore?

Many people are so intimidated by radical Islam, so fearful of becoming victims themselves, that their fear is unconsciously transformed into a strange sympathy and support for the terrorists, or at least for their worldview. The key word here is “unconsciously.” We’re not talking about merely “playing along” as a survival strategy; we’re talking about actual change, conversion, paradigm shift.

But then, isn’t his exactly how forced conversion to Islam “at the point of a sword” has always worded throughout the centuries?

And isn’t this what’s really behind the absurd bending-over-backwards political correctness we see in America and Europe today with regard to Islam? Just consider:


  • A British government-backed awards event banned “The Three Little Pigs” from consideration because the presence of pigs in the classic children’s story might offend Muslims.
  • Muslims convicts incarcerated in Britain’s high-security Leeds Prison were outraged that the prison mistakenly posted a menu offering ham sandwiches as one of three Ramadan food choices, and a few claimed they were actually served ham. Indignant Muslim prisoners sued the prison for $20 million.

United States

  • The U.S. government, not wanting to offend Muslim sensitivities, rarely mentions “Muslim” or “Islamic” when describing Islamic terrorism. For instance, when a massive jihad plot to blow up 10 airliners over the Atlantic and kill thousands was foiled back in 2006, then-homeland Security chief Micahel Chertoff briefed his agency using only the word “extremists” to describe the plotters—no mention of Islam. All of the two dozen would-be terrorists were Muslims. Little has changed since.

appeasement-terrorAs long as the West becomes continually weaker and more contemptible in it attempts to placate Islam, the conflict will just intensify. In fact, believe it or not, it is our weakness that is actually fueling the growth of Islamo-fascism. That’s right: When you behold the ever-increasing radicalization, arrogance and fury of today’s jihadists, realize that we are literally feeding it. We’re nurturing it. We’re rocking the cradle.


Terrorism Facts Part 2: How did the Greatest Generation conquer 20th Century Terrorism?

Obama foreign policy, Iran Deal vs. National Security

Truth Zone—

Obama foreign policy, Iran Deal vs. National Security

keySo name for me a foreign policy success, a success that Obama has achieved that would indicate his promises of Iran’s future behavior will pan out.  After all, the president has assured us that with this deal Iran is now gonna be a bunch of nice guys, that we can essentially trust them. Name an enemy of the United States in foreign policy that Obama has dealt with effectively.  The Democrat Party and their foreign policy gave us ISIS. 

Why, then, are we giving them $140 billion and why is he admitting that he knows they’re gonna use this money to expand their terror networks?

~Rush Limbaugh

Why Obama is wrong about Iran’s “good intentions”—they don’t think like we do, and never will

Related: Shocking facts

Treasonous Plan in Benghazi revealed: Kidnap Stevens and exchange him for the blind sheik

Rush Limbaugh radio

obama-iran-bowThe president’s telling us, and John Kerry told us, in case you have forgotten, do you remember what John Kerry said yesterday about why we did this deal?  John Kerry said that one of the reasons why, one of the main reasons why we did this deal was to show the rest of the world the peaceful nature of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

So name for me a foreign policy success, a success that Obama has achieved that would indicate his promises of Iran’s future behavior will pan out.  After all, the president has assured us that with this deal Iran is now gonna be a bunch of nice guys, that we can essentially trust them.  Well, let’s look.

This is my point But let’s go.  What about Libya?  Libya is an absolute mess.  Libya is an absolute joke compared to what it was.  Obama backed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  He destroyed Iraq and he destroyed Syria when he bugged out of Iraq and thus created ISIS.  And that is so true that Obama and the Democrats are trying to blame Bush for ISIS, yeah, Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib and all these other violations of dignity that our torture program involved, gave us ISIS.  No.  Obama gave us ISIS.  The Democrat Party and their foreign policy gave us ISIS. 

He’s done nothing to slow the aggressive behavior of the ChiComs or the Russians.  He traded five high-value terrorists, gave away five high-value terrorists for a traitor and deserter, Bowe Bergdahl.  You talk about the Cuban deal, he has legitimized the Castros.  Think of that.  The Castros, Raul and Fidel now have been essentially validated and legitimized.  The only person on the world stage that Barack Obama has successfully undermined — let’s look at it that way.  Name for me one enemy of the United States that has been undermined.

netanyahuName an enemy of the United States in foreign policy that Obama has dealt with effectively.  You can’t.  And yet there is an answer to the question.  There is someone on the world stage Obama has undermined.  Who is it?  It’s Benjamin Netanyahu and our ally, Israel.  Obama has undermined Israel.  Obama has undermined Netanyahu.  The prime minister of America’s great ally in the Middle East. 

obama-hates-israelNow, we’re supposed to trust that Barack Obama has now tamed Iran and the Ayatollah Khamenei and his buddy of mullahs with this piece of paper granting them the right in a certain number of years to develop a nuclear weapon is going to be make them nice guys and it’s gonna show them we don’t intend them any ill or harm.  (interruption)  What’s what?  (interruption)  Well, I know, his response (imitating Obama), “Well, what’s the alternative, what would you do?  I mean, what would you do with Iran?  Would you go to war?  Would you put boots on the ground?”

media-sycophantsAt his Victory Dance with the Media …

No, if you’re gonna enter into negotiations with them, and if what they desperately want is a nuclear weapon, then they’re gonna have to pay for that an incredible price, and one of the incredible prices they’re gonna have to pay is ongoing, never ending monitoring.  If they claim they don’t want a nuclear weapon, we’re gonna be on site 24/7 to prove to ourselves that all they’re doing is developing nuclear power.  If that’s what they really want, they’re gonna let us watch every step of the way.  And if they don’t let us watch every step of the way, then we do not help them move forward. It’s that simple. We keep the sanctions on and maybe even clamp them down.  That’s my alternative.

The Democrats when they say, “Well, what’s your alternative?” They always think, “What are you gonna do, just gonna turn loose the Israelis to bomb Iran? Are we gonna bomb?”  No, no.  We don’t have to do that.  They really want this.  The Iranians really want it.  Why do they want a nuclear weapon?  Who threatens them?  Who do they threaten?  Why in the world do they want one?  Doesn’t matter, they do.  They really want one.  Well, then exact a huge price for it.

KerrybloodyhandsBut that’s not what we have done here in any stretch of the imagination.  We’re supposed to trust instead that Obama has tamed Iran with this deal.  And John Kerry has told us, oh yeah, the Iranians, the purpose of this deal was to show what a trustworthy partner they are.  But all I’m asking is for some evidence that Obama can deliver on any promise he makes in the area of foreign policy, and what evidence exists that Obama’s even playing this straight.  Based on past performance, if Obama says Iran will not get the bomb, they will.  You can take that bet to Las Vegas right now, if they would even give you odds.

If Obama and John Kerry are right about the peaceful nature of Iran, then why would rejecting the deal automatically mean war?  Did you hear what Obama said about this?  Obama has, and Kerry, too, they’ve made it clear that if we don’t do this, that the Iranians are gonna get so mad that who knows what they might do.

What do you mean?  We’re told on the other side of their mouth that Iran is peaceful, that Iran is well-intentioned, that Iran just wants to join the community of nations, that Iran just wants to be in the big clique, that Iran just wants to be respected.  Well, then, why would they be a clear and present danger to the world, should this deal be voted down?  Have you heard the intensity with which Obama’s threatening Congress?  Why?

I mean, if Iran is harmless, and if Iran is just well-intentioned and all that, and we can do a deal here to illustrate the good nature of the Iranian government, why threaten people with what Iran might do if this doesn’t happen?  I mean, how do the two go together?  How could Iran be this wonderfully peaceful — and, by the way, that is a new one on me.  That is a great insult to everybody’s intelligence anyway.  Everything’s upside down.

But still, the question remains: If they are this wonderful set of characteristics Obama and Kerry tell us about, then why are they gonna go bat nuts if they don’t get their deal?  The two just don’t go together.  And, by the way, as you’ll hear in the sound bites coming up here in a moment: If Iran would not sign this deal if we had included that they release American hostages, well, how can you trust these people?  If that’s a deal-breaker?

treasonaidabetenemyWhy, then, are we giving them $140 billion and why is he admitting that he knows they’re gonna use this money to expand their terror networks?

Not to mention the leftovers will be spent widening and deepening their path to nuclear weapons.  So Iran’s dangerous. They told us that: Iran’s dangerous.  These things don’t go together, folks.  On the one hand Obama tells us that Iran’s dangerous and he knows they’re gonna take some of this money they get from the sanctions being lifted and sue it to fund their terrorist networks. And on the same hand, Obama told ’em, “We can’t demand the release of those four Americans ’cause then they would demand other concessions, and we can’t provoke them in that way.”

I mean, the world has gotten angrier with his presidency and his arrival. It has gotten more dangerous. It has become more deadly.  And you know it’s insane when a reporter asks a question about American hostages and why they weren’t released in “a landmark deal,” and the reporter is seen as the primary threat, not the Iranians! Major Garrett is a primary threat to Obama.  Major Garrett’s a primary threat to whatever. 

Major Garrett’s the problem! A reporter for CBS News is the problem, not Iranians.  They’re holding the four hostages, but Major Garrett’s the problem.  He had the audacity to bring that up. The audacity! Here everybody’s basking in the glow of this wonderful, great deal. “Oh, my God, no president could have ever, ever done this kind of deal,” and Major Garrett stands and says what about the four hostages: Why don’t you release them?

Well, there went the glow of the day.

That just blew up this entire manufactured good vibe of a press conference, and so Major Garrett had to be taken out.

Clear History: ISIS, Nazi Germany, and Warning on Muslim Extremists

Clear History Patterns—


keyThis is from one who has been through it all and recognizes the signs. ‘We are told again and again by ‘experts’ and ‘talking heads’ that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant.The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and  extraneous.

magnifying-glass-lightoftruth‘The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is  the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.’  ~Dr. Emanuel Tanya

The following excellent article was forwarded to us by friends.  We were in grade school during World War II; this article explains how we — at the time — didn’t necessarily understand the whole reason why we were fighting Germany and Japan.  Hopefully, now some 60 to 70 years later, we’ll be a lot smarter in dealing with today’s enemy, Islam.

Islam: a German view!!!

A German’s View on Islam – worth reading. This is one of the best explanations of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read.

His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist.    A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and  estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 

HitleryouthVery few people were true Nazis,’ he said, ‘but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many  more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.’  
‘My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.’

‘We are told again and again by ‘experts’ and ‘talking heads’ that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.’

EGYPT-POLITICS-UNREST‘The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is  the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.’

‘The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and  extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China ‘s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.’

swordpirate‘The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda , which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were ‘peace loving’?

‘History lessons are often  incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because like my friend from Germany , they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will  have begun.’ 

‘Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.’ 

‘Now Islamic prayers have been  introduced in Toronto and other public  schools in Ontario , and, yes, in  Ottawa, too, while the Lord’s Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The  Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the  fanatics move in.’

‘In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft have the halal emblem just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation’s shores.’

MuslimWarrior‘In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of “no-go” zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not  intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.’

‘As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts – the fanatics who threaten our way of life.’

Extend yourself a bit and share this. Let us hope that thousands world-wide read this, think about it,  and send it on before it’s too late, and we are silenced because we were  silent!!!

Wake Up!

World News: Barack Obama vs. Israeli Jets


World News Report: Obama threatened to shoot down Israeli jets

Kuwaiti paper says Netanyahu aborted 2014 attack on Iran nukes

IsraeliJets32President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran, according to a Kuwaiti newspaper cited by the Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an.

In the wake of Obama’s purported threat, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was said to be forced to abort the strike on Iran.

Israel National News published an account of the report from Al-Jarida. It said the Netanyahu government decided to attack Iran “some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel’s back.”

The report claimed an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the Obama administration disclosed details of the attack plan to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, and that “Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.”

The Kuwaiti paper quoted “well-placed” sources saying Netanyahu, Minister of Defense Moshe Yaalon, and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, chose to hit Iran’s nuclear facilities after discussions with top security commanders.

According to the report, “Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army’s chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran’s nuclear program. In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel’s security.”
Israeli fighter jets trained are said to have trained for several weeks in order to ensure the plan’s success, even carrying out experimental flights in Iran’s airspace after they managed to penetrate Iranian radar.

obama-stand-w-muslimsFormer U.S. diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski, and ardent campaigner for Obama in 2008, called on the president to shoot down Israeli planes if they attack Iran.

“They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?” said the former national security advisor to former President Jimmy Carter in an interview with the Daily Beast.

“We have to be serious about denying them that right,” he said. “If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a ‘Liberty’ in reverse.”

During the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel mistakenly attacked the American ship Liberty.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/report-obama-threatened-to-shoot-down-israeli-jets/#bDtPlWtJEjDhzVc5.99